Exercises from Section 1.2.6

Tord M. Johnson

May 7, 2015

1. [00] How many combinations of n things taken n − 1 at a time are possible?

There are n n−1 = n combinations of n things taken n − 1 at a time. Intuitively, each distinct set of n − 1 objects leaves out a single item, and there are n items.

2. [00] What is 0 0?

We have

0 0 = 0! 0!(0 − 0)! = 1 1 = 1.

Intuitively, there is only a single way to choose nothing from nothing.

3. [00] How many bridge hands (13 cards out of a 52-card deck) are possible?

There are 52 13 = 635013559600 possible bridge hands, as we are choosing 13 from 52 things.

4. [10] Give the answer to exercise 3 as a product of prime numbers.

The answer to exercise 3 was 52 13 = 52! 13!(52−13)! = 52! 13!39!. We can use Eq. 1.2.5-(8) to determine the prime factorization of each factorial and then the answer as a whole as

52 13 = 52! 13!39! = 249 ⋅ 323 ⋅ 512 ⋅ 78 ⋅ 114 ⋅ 134 ⋅ 173 ⋅ 192 ⋅ 232 ⋅ 29 ⋅ 31 ⋅ 37 ⋅ 41 ⋅ 43 ⋅ 47 210 ⋅ 35 ⋅ 52 ⋅ 7 ⋅ 11 ⋅ 13 ⋅ 235 ⋅ 318 ⋅ 58 ⋅ 75 ⋅ 113 ⋅ 133 ⋅ 172 ⋅ 192 ⋅ 23 ⋅ 29 ⋅ 31 ⋅ 37 = 249 ⋅ 323 ⋅ 512 ⋅ 78 ⋅ 114 ⋅ 134 ⋅ 173 ⋅ 192 ⋅ 232 ⋅ 29 ⋅ 31 ⋅ 37 ⋅ 41 ⋅ 43 ⋅ 47 245 ⋅ 323 ⋅ 510 ⋅ 76 ⋅ 114 ⋅ 134 ⋅ 172 ⋅ 192 ⋅ 23 ⋅ 29 ⋅ 31 ⋅ 37 = 24 ⋅ 52 ⋅ 72 ⋅ 17 ⋅ 23 ⋅ 41 ⋅ 43 ⋅ 47.

▸ 5. [05] Use Pascal’s triangle to explain the fact that 114 = 14641.

By the binomial theorem,

114 = (10 + 1)4 = ∑ 0≤k≤4 4 k10k14−k = 4 4104 + 4 3103 + 4 2102 + 4 1101 + 4 0100 = (1)104 + (4)103 + (6)102 + (4)101 + (1)100 = 14641.

That is, the digits represent the row in Pascal’s triangle for 4 k, 0 ≤ k ≤ 4.

▸ 6. [10] Pascal’s triangle (Table 1) can be extended in all directions by use of the addition formula, Eq. (9). Find the three rows that go on top of Table 1 (i.e., for r = −1, − 2, and − 3).

Using Eq. (9)

r k = r − 1 k + r − 1 k − 1

we can extend Pascal’s triangle (Table 1) for r = −1, − 2, and − 3 as












rr 0r 1r 2r 3r 4r 5r 6r 7r 8r 9











-3 1 -3 6 -10 15 -21 28 -36 45 -55
-2 1 -2 3 -4 5 -6 7 -8 9 -10
-1 1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 1 -1











since r 0 = 1, r 1 = r, and r−1 k = r k − r−1 k−1.

7. [12] If n is a fixed positive integer, what value of k makes n k a maximum?

Proposition. n k ≤ n ⌈n∕2⌉ = n ⌊n∕2⌋ for all integers n ≥ 1, k.

Proof. Let n, k be arbitrary integers such that n ≥ 1. We must show that

n k ≤ n ⌈n∕2⌉ = n ⌊n∕2⌋.

First, we must show that the binomial coefficient is monotone in k, 0 ≤ k ≤⌈n 2 ⌉. That is, that

n k − 1 ≤ n k1 ≤ k ≤ n 2 .

But

k ≤ n 2 ⇔k ≤ n + 1 2 ⇔2k ≤ n + 1 ⇔k ≤ n − k + 1 ⇔k ≤ n − (k − 1) ⇔ k n − (k − 1) ≤ 1 ⇔ k n − (k − 1) n k ≤ n k ⇔ k n − (k − 1) n! k!(n − k)! ≤ n k ⇔ n! (k − 1)!(n − (k − 1))! ≤ n k ⇔ n k − 1 ≤ n k.

And by definition, since n k = 0 < 1 = n 0 for k < 0, we have in general that if k ≤ n 2

n k − 1 ≤ n k,

or equivalently that if k ≤ n 2

n k ≤ n ⌈n∕2⌉.

In the case that k > n 2 ,

k > n 2 ⇔ − k < −n 2 ⇔n − k < n −n 2 ⇔n − k < n + − n 2 ⇔n − k < n + − n 2 ⇔n − k < n 2

so that

n k = n n − k ≤ n ⌊n∕2⌋ = n ⌈n∕2⌉.

That is for all integers n ≥ 1 and k

n k ≤ n ⌈n∕2⌉ = n ⌊n∕2⌋

as we needed to show. □

8. [00] What property of Pascal’s triangle is reflected in the “symmetry condition,” Eq. (6)?

The property of Pascal’s triangle that is reflected in the “symmetry condition,” Eq. (6), is the symmetry of the triangle itself. That is, each row, not counting zeros, is palindromic: values read the same left to right and vice versa.

9. [01] What is the value of n n? (Consider all integers n.)

Since n n = n 0 = 1 and n k = 0 for k < 0, we have

n n = 1if n ≥ 0 0otherwise.

▸ 10. [M25] If p is prime, show that:

a)
n p ≡ n p(modulo p).
b)
p k ≡ 0(modulo p), for 1 ≤ k ≤ p − 1.
c)
p − 1 k ≡ (−1)k(modulo p), for 0 ≤ k ≤ p − 1.
d)
p + 1 k ≡ 0(modulo p), for 2 ≤ k ≤ p − 1.
e)
(É. Lucas, 1877.)
n k ≡ ⌊n∕p⌋ ⌊k∕p⌋ n mod p k mod p(modulo p).
f)
If the p-ary number system representations of n and k are
n = arpr + ⋯ + a1p + a0,
k = brpr + ⋯ + b1p + b0,
thenn k ≡ ar br … ⁡a1 b1 a0 b0 (modulo p).

The answers to exercise 10 follow below.

a)
We may prove the equivalence.

Proposition. n p ≡ n p (mod ⁡p).

Proof. Let n and p be arbitrary integers such that n ≥ 1 and p prime. We must show that

n p ≡ n p(mod ⁡p).

But given (e) with k = p,

n p ≡ ⌊n∕p⌋ ⌊p∕p⌋ n mod p p mod p ≡ ⌊n∕p⌋ 1 n mod p 0 ≡ ⌊n∕p⌋ 1 ≡ n p(mod ⁡p)

as we needed to show. □

b)
We may prove the equivalence.

Proposition. p k ≡ 0(mod ⁡p) for 1 ≤ k ≤ p − 1.

Proof. Let p and k be arbitrary integers such that p is prime and 1 ≤ k ≤ p − 1. We must show that

p k ≡ 0(mod ⁡p).

But given (e) with n = p, and since k∕p < 1,

p k ≡ ⌊p∕p⌋ ⌊k∕p⌋ p mod p k mod p ≡ 1 0 0 k ≡ 1 ⋅ 0 ≡ 0(mod ⁡p)

as we needed to show. □

c)
We may prove the equivalence.

Proposition. p−1 k ≡ (−1)k(mod ⁡p) for 0 ≤ k ≤ p − 1.

Proof. Let p and k be arbitrary integers such that p is prime and 0 ≤ k ≤ p − 1. We must show that

p − 1 k ≡ (−1)k(mod ⁡p).

If k = 0, then clearly

p − 1 0 ≡ 1 ≡ (−1)k(mod ⁡p).

Then, assuming

p − 1 k ≡ (−1)k(mod ⁡p),

we must show that

p − 1 k + 1 ≡ (−1)k+1(mod ⁡p).

But by the addition formula and (b),

p − 1 k + 1 ≡ p k + 1 − p − 1 k ≡ p k + 1 − (−1)k ≡ 0 − (−1)k ≡ (−1)k+1(mod ⁡p)

as we needed to show. □

d)
We may prove the equivalence.

Proposition. p+1 k ≡ 0(mod ⁡p) for 2 ≤ k ≤ p − 1.

Proof. Let p and k be arbitrary integers such that p is prime and 2 ≤ k ≤ p − 1. We must show that

p + 1 k ≡ 0(mod ⁡p).

But by the addition formula Eq. (3) and (b),

p + 1 k ≡ p k + p k − 1 ≡ 0 + 0 ≡ 0(mod ⁡p)

as we needed to show. □

e)
We may prove the equivalence.

Proposition. n k ≡ n∕p k∕p nmodp kmodp(mod ⁡p).

Proof. Let n, k, and p be arbitrary integers such that p is prime. We must show that

n k ≡ n∕p k∕p n mod p k mod p(mod ⁡p).

Note that

n = n pp + (n mod p) 0 ≤ n mod p < p, k = k pp + (k mod p) 0 ≤ k mod p < p.

Also note from Eq. (7), that

sr s = rr − 1 s − 1,

with r = pn∕p and s = k implies

pn∕p s ≡ 0(mod ⁡p)

and for arbitrary x that

(x + 1)n∕pp ≡ (xp + 1)n∕p(mod ⁡p).

Then, for arbitrary x by the binomial theorem,

∑ 0≤k≤nn kxk = (x + 1)n = (x + 1)n∕pp+(nmodp) = (x + 1)n∕pp(x + 1)nmodp ≡ (xp + 1)n∕p(x + 1)nmodp(mod ⁡p) = ∑ 0≤i≤n∕p n∕p i xip ∑ 0≤j≤nmodpn mod p j xj = ∑ 0≤ip+j≤n∕pp+(nmodp) n∕p i n mod p j xip+j = ∑ 0≤k≤n n∕p k∕p n mod p k mod pxk,

or equivalently, by equating coefficients

n k ≡ n∕p k∕p n mod p k mod p(mod ⁡p)

as we needed to show. □

f)
We may prove the equivalence.

Proposition. If n = ∑ ⁡ 0≤i≤raipi and k = ∑ ⁡ 0≤i≤rbipi, then n k ≡∏ ⁡ 0≤i≤rai bi (mod ⁡p).

Proof. Let n, k, and p be arbitrary integers such that n = ∑ ⁡ 0≤i≤raipi and k = ∑ ⁡ 0≤i≤rbipi are the p-ary number representations of n and k with r coefficients ai, bi, respectively, 0 ≤ i ≤ r and 0 ≤ ai,bi ≤ p. We must show that

n k ≡∏ 0≤i≤rai bi (modp).

If r = 0, then n = a0 and k = b0, and clearly,

n k ≡ a0 b0 ≡∏ 0≤i≤rai bi (modp).

Then, assuming for an arbitrary integer r ≥ 0 with n = ∑ ⁡ 0≤i≤raipi and k = ∑ ⁡ 0≤i≤rbipi that

n k ≡∏ 0≤i≤rai bi (modp),

we must show that

n′ k′ ≡∏ 0≤i≤r+1ai bi (modp)

for n′ = ar+1pr+1 + n = ∑ ⁡ 0≤i≤r+1aipi and k′ = br+1pr+1 + k = ∑ ⁡ 0≤i≤r+1bipi.

But given (e)

n′ k′ ≡ n′∕p k′∕p n′ mod p k′ mod p ≡ 1 p ∑ 0≤i≤r+1aipi 1 p ∑ 0≤i≤r+1bipi ∑ 0≤i≤r+1aipi mod p ∑ 0≤i≤r+1bipi mod p ≡ ∑ 0≤i≤r+1aipi−1 ∑ 0≤i≤r+1bipi−1 a0 b0 ≡ ∑ 1≤i≤r+1aipi−1 ∑ 1≤i≤r+1bipi−1 a0 b0 ≡ ∑ 0≤i≤rai+1pi ∑ 0≤i≤rbi+1pi a0 b0 ≡ a0 b0 ∑ 0≤i≤rai+1pi ∑ 0≤i≤rbi+1pi ≡ a0 b0 ∏ 0≤i≤rai+1 bi+1 ≡ a0 b0 ∏ 1≤i≤r+1ai bi ≡∏ 0≤i≤r+1ai bi (modp)

as we needed to show. □

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

É. Lucas, American J. Math. 1 (1878), 229–230; L. E. Dickson, Quart. J. Math. 33 (1902), 383–384; N. J. Fine, AMM 54 (1947), 589–592.

▸ 11. [M20] (E. Kummer, 1852.) Let p be prime. Show that if pn divides

a + b a

but pn+1 does not, then n is equal to the number of carries that occur when a is added to b in the p-ary number system. [Hint: See exercise 1.2.5-12.]

Proposition. If p is prime and pn∣a+b a but pn+1 ∤ a+b a , then n is the number of carries that occur when a is added to b in the p-ary number system.

Proof. Let p, n, a, and b be arbitrary nonnegative integers such that p is prime,

pn∣a + b a ,

and

pn+1 ∤ a + b a .

We must show that n is the number of carries that occur when a is added to b in the p-ary number system. That is, given representations a = ∑ ⁡ 0≤k≤rakpk, b = ∑ ⁡ 0≤k≤rbkpk, and a + b = c = ∑ ⁡ 0≤k≤rckpk, that n is zero for a + b < p and increases by one for every additional carry.

But

a + b a = c a = c! a!b!

and for μ from exercise 1.2.5-12,

pn∣ c! a!b! ⇔ pμ(c!) pμ(a!)pμ(b!)∣ c! a!b! ⇔pμ(c!)−μ(a!)−μ(b!)∣ c! a!b! ⇔n = μ(c!) − μ(a!) − μ(b!).

Then,

n = μ c! − μ a! − μ b! = c −∑ 0≤k≤rck p − 1 −a −∑ 0≤k≤rak p − 1 −b −∑ 0≤k≤rbk p − 1 = c −∑ 0≤k≤rck − a + ∑ 0≤k≤rak − b + ∑ 0≤k≤rbk p − 1 = −∑ 0≤k≤rck + ∑ 0≤k≤rak + ∑ 0≤k≤rbk p − 1 = ∑ 0≤k≤rak + bk − ck p − 1 .

To see show that n is the number of carries, we construct an inductive argument. As our basis, we consider a + b < p, so that r = 0, a = a0 < p, b = b0 < p, and a + b = c = c0 < p. In this case, we have no carries, and n is given by

n = ∑ 0≤k≤rak + bk − ck p − 1 = a0 + b0 − c0 p − 1 = 0,

as expected. Then, assuming n is the number of carries for arbitrary r and a + b = c, we must show that n′ = n + 1 for a + b = c′ given a single carry from digit κ − 1 to κ as a result of the addition of ak−1 + bk−1 ≥ p, establishing the relation

ck′ = ck − pif k = κ − 1 ck + 1if k = κ ck otherwise.

But

n′ = ∑ 0≤k≤rak + bk − ck′ p − 1 = ∑ 0≤k≤r κ−1≤k≤κ ak + bk − ck′ + ∑ 0≤k≤r k<κ−1∨κ<k ak + bk − ck′ p − 1 = aκ−1 + bκ−1 − cκ−1′ + aκ + bκ − cκ′ + ∑ 0≤k≤r k<κ−1∨κ<k ak + bk − ck′ p − 1 = aκ−1 + bκ−1 − (cκ−1 − p) + aκ + bκ − (cκ + 1) + ∑ 0≤k≤r k<κ−1∨κ<k ak + bk − ck p − 1 = p − 1 + aκ−1 + bκ−1 − cκ−1 + aκ + bκ − cκ + ∑ 0≤k≤r k<κ−1∨κ<k ak + bk − ck p − 1 = p − 1 + ∑ 0≤k≤r κ−1≤k≤κ ak + bk − ck + ∑ 0≤k≤r k<κ−1∨κ<k ak + bk − ck p − 1 = p − 1 + ∑ 0≤k≤rak + bk − ck p − 1 = ∑ 0≤k≤rak + bk − ck p − 1 + p − 1 p − 1 = n + 1

as we needed to show. □

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Knuth and Wilf, Crelle 396 (1989), 212–219.

12. [M22] Are there any positive integers n for which all the nonzero entries in the nth row of Pascal’s triangle are odd? If so, find all such n.

We want to find all positive integers n such that if n k > 0, then n k ≡ 1(mod ⁡2). Let k be an arbitrary integer such that 0 ≤ k ≤ n, and, from Eq. (3), so that n k > 0. We want to find n such that

n k ≡ 1(mod ⁡2).

But, by exercise 1.2.6-10(f), given the binary representations n = ∑ ⁡ 0≤i≤rai2i and k = ∑ ⁡ 0≤i≤rbi2i,

n k ≡∏ 0≤i≤rai bi ≡ 1(mod ⁡2)

if and only if each ai bi = 1. Since for each ai and bi, 0 ≤ ai,bi ≤ 1, of the four cases, we require bi ≤ ai; or equivalently, we require ai = 1 unless n = k = 0; or

n = ∑ 0≤i≤r2i = 2r+1 − 1.

Hence, all the nonzero entries in the nth row of Pascal’s triangle—those for which 0 ≤ k ≤ n—are odd if n = 2m − 1 for some integer m ≥ 0. (This can be generalized to nondivisibility by a prime p if n = apm − 1 for 1 ≤ a < p.)

13. [M13] Prove the summation formula, Eq. (10).

Proposition. ∑ ⁡ 0≤k≤nr+k k = r+n+1 n .

Proof. Let n and r be arbitrary integers such that n ≥ 0. We must show that

∑ 0≤k≤nr + k k = r + n + 1 n .

If n = 0, from Eq. (4),

∑ 0≤k≤nr + k k = ∑ 0≤k≤0r + k k = r + 0 0 = r 0 = 1 = r + 0 + 1 0 = r + n + 1 n .

Then, assuming

∑ 0≤k≤nr + k k = r + n + 1 n ,

we must show that

∑ 0≤k≤n+1r + k k = r + n + 2 n + 1 .

But

∑ 0≤k≤n+1r + k k = r + n + 1 n + 1 + ∑ 0≤k≤nr + k k = r + n + 1 n + 1 + r + n + 1 n = (r + n + 1)! (n + 1)!r! + (r + n + 1)! n!(r + 1)! = (r + 1)(r + n + 1)! (n + 1)!(r + 1)! + (n + 1)(r + n + 1)! (n + 1)!(r + 1)! = (r + 1)(r + n + 1)! + (n + 1)(r + n + 1)! (n + 1)!(r + 1)! = (r + n + 2)(r + n + 1)! (n + 1)!(r + 1)! = (r + n + 2)! (n + 1)!(r + 1)! = r + n + 2 n + 1

as we needed to show. □

14. [M21] Evaluate ∑ ⁡ k=0nk4.

For an arbitrary integer k ≥ 0,

k4 = ∑ 0≤j≤44 jkj¯ from Eq. (45) = ∑ 0≤j≤44 jj!k j from Eq. (3) = 24k 4 + 36k 3 + 14k 2 + k 1.

Summing over k and from Eq. (11),

∑ 0≤k≤nk4 = ∑ 0≤k≤n 24k 4 + 36k 3 + 14k 2 + k 1 = 24∑ 0≤k≤nk 4 + 36∑ 0≤k≤nk 3 + 14∑ 0≤k≤nk 2 + ∑ 0≤k≤nk 1 = 24n + 1 5 + 36n + 1 4 + 14n + 1 3 + n + 1 2 = n5 5 + n4 2 + n3 3 − n 30 = 1 30n(n + 1)(2n + 1)(3n2 + 3n − 1) = n(n + 1)(n + 1 2)(3n2 + 3n − 1) 15 .

15. [M15] Prove the binomial formula, Eq. (13).

Proposition. (x + y)r = ∑ ⁡ 0≤k≤rr kxkyr−k.

Proof. Let x, y, and r be arbitrary integers such that r ≥ 0. We must show that

(x + y)r = ∑ 0≤k≤rr kxkyr−k.

If r = 0, then clearly

(x + y)r = (x + y)0 = 1 = 0 0x0y0 = ∑ 0≤k≤rr kxkyr−k.

Then, assuming

(x + y)r = ∑ 0≤k≤rr kxkyr−k,

we must show that

(x + y)r+1 = ∑ 0≤k≤r+1r + 1 k xkyr+1−k.

But

(x + y)r+1 = (x + y)(x + y)r = (x + y)∑ 0≤k≤rr kxkyr−k = x∑ 0≤k≤rr kxkyr−k + y∑ 0≤k≤rr kxkyr−k = ∑ 0≤k≤rr kxk+1yr−k + ∑ 0≤k≤rr kxkyr+1−k = ∑ 0≤k−1≤r r k − 1xkyr+1−k + ∑ 0≤k≤rr kxkyr+1−k = ∑ 1≤k≤r+1 r k − 1xkyr+1−k + ∑ 0≤k≤rr kxkyr+1−k = ∑ 0≤k≤r+1 r k − 1xkyr+1−k + ∑ 0≤k≤r+1 r kxkyr+1−k = ∑ 0≤k≤r+1r + 1 k xkyr+1−k from Eq. (9)

as we needed to show. □

16. [M15] Given that n and k are positive integers, prove the symmetrical identity

(−1)n −n k − 1 = (−1)k −k n − 1.

Proposition. (−1)n −n k−1 = (−1)k −k n−1.

Proof. Let n and k be arbitrary positive integers. We must show that

(−1)n −n k − 1 = (−1)k −k n − 1.

But

(−1)n −n k − 1 = (−1)n(−1)k−1k − 1 + n − 1 k − 1 from Eq. (17) = (−1)n+k−1n + k − 2 k − 1 = (−1)k(−1)n−1n − 1 + k − 1 k − 1 = (−1)k(−1)n−1 n − 1 + k − 1 n − 1 + k − 1 − (k − 1) from Eq. (6) = (−1)k(−1)n−1n − 1 + k − 1 n − 1 = (−1)k −k n − 1 from Eq. (17)

as we needed to show. □

▸ 17. [M18] Prove the Chu-Vandermonde formula (21) from Eq. (15), using the idea that (1 + x)r+s = (1 + x)r(1 + x)s.

Proposition. ∑ ⁡ 0≤k≤rr k s n−k = r+s n .

Proof. Let r and s be arbitrary positive integers. We must show that

∑ 0≤k≤rr k s n − k = r + s n

from Eq. (15)

∑ 0≤k≤rr kxk = (1 + x)r

and from the identity

(1 + x)r+s = (1 + x)r(1 + x)s.

But

∑ 0≤n≤r+sr + s n xn = (1 + x)r+s = (1 + x)r(1 + x)s = ∑ 0≤k≤rr kxk ∑ 0≤k≤ss kxk = ∑ 0≤k≤rr kxk ∑ 0≤n−k≤s s n − kxn−k = ∑ 0≤n≤r+s ∑ 0≤k≤rr k s n − kxn.

Equating coefficients yields

r + s n = ∑ 0≤k≤rr k s n − k

as we needed to show. □

18. [M15] Prove Eq. (22) using Eqs. (21) and (6).

Proposition. ∑ ⁡ k r m+k s n+k = r+s r−m+n.

Proof. Let m, n, r, and s be arbitrary integers such that r ≥ 0. We must show that

∑ k r m + k s n + k = r + s r − m + n.

But

∑ k r m + k s n + k = ∑ k−m r m + k − m s n + k − m = ∑ kr k s n + k − m = ∑ kr k s k + n − m = ∑ kr k s s − k + m − n from Eq. (6) = r + s r + s − r + m − n from Eq. (21) = r + s r − m + n from Eq. (6)

as we needed to show. □

19. [M18] Prove Eq. (23) by induction.

Proposition. ∑ ⁡ kr k s+k n (−1)r−k = s n−r for integers n, r ≥ 0.

Proof. Let n, r, and s be arbitrary integers such that r ≥ 0. We must show that

∑ kr k s + k n (−1)r−k = s n − r.

If r = 0

∑ kr k s + k n (−1)r−k = ∑ k0 k s + k n (−1)−k = 0 0 s + 0 n (−1)0 = s n = s n − r.

Then, assuming

∑ kr k s + k n (−1)r−k = s n − r,

we must show that

∑ kr + 1 k s + k n (−1)r+1−k = s n − r − 1.

But

∑ kr + 1 k s + k n (−1)r+1−k = ∑ k r k + r k − 1 s + k n (−1)r+1−k = ∑ kr k s + k n (−1)r+1−k + ∑ k r k − 1 s + k n (−1)r+1−k = −∑ kr k s + k n (−1)r−k + ∑ k+1 r k s + k + 1 n (−1)r−k = −∑ kr k s + k n (−1)r−k + ∑ kr k s + k + 1 n (−1)r−k = − s n − r + s + 1 n − r = s + 1 n − r − s n − r = s + 1 s + 1 − (n − r) s n − r − s n − r = s + 1 s + 1 − (n − r) − 1 s n − r = n − r s + 1 − n + r s n − r = n − r s − n + r + 1 s! (n − r)!(s − n + r)! = s! (n − r − 1)!(s − n + r + 1)! = s n − r − 1

as we needed to show. □

20. [M20] Prove Eq. (24) by using Eqs. (21) and (19), then show that another use of Eq. (19) yields Eq. (25).

We may prove Eq. (24) using Eqs. (19) and (21).

Proposition. ∑ ⁡ 0≤k≤rr−k m s k−t(−1)k−t = r−t−s r−t−m for nonnegative integers t, r, and m.

Proof. Let r, m, s, and t be arbitrary integers such that r,m,t ≥ 0. We must show that

∑ 0≤k≤rr − k m s k − t(−1)k−t = r − t − s r − t − m.

But

∑ 0≤k≤rr − k m s k − t(−1)k−t = ∑ 0≤k≤r(−1)r−k−m −(m + 1) r − k − m s k − t(−1)k−tfrom Eq. (19) = ∑ 0≤k≤r(−1)r−m−t −(m + 1) r − k − m s k − t = (−1)r−m−t ∑ 0≤k≤r −(m + 1) r − k − m s k − t = (−1)r−m−t ∑ −t≤k−t≤r−t −(m + 1) r − k − t − m s k = (−1)r−t−m ∑ ks k −(m + 1) r − t − m − k = (−1)r−t−ms − m − 1 r − t − m from Eq. (21) = (−1)r−t−mr − t − m − r + t + s − 1 r − t − m = r − t − s r − t − m from Eq. (17)

as we needed to show. □

We may also show that another use of Eq. (19) yields Eq. (25).

Proposition. ∑ ⁡ 0≤k≤rr−k m s+k n = r+s+1 m+n+1 for nonnegative integers m, n, r, and s.

Proof. Let m, n, r, and s be arbtirary nonnegative integers. We must show that

∑ 0≤k≤rr − k m s + k n = r + s + 1 m + n + 1.

But

∑ 0≤k≤rr − k m s + k n = ∑ 0≤k≤rr − k m (−1)s+k−n −(n + 1) s + k − n from Eq. (19) = ∑ 0≤k≤rr − k m −(n + 1) k − (n − s)(−1)k−(n−s) = r − (n − s) + n + 1 r − (n − s) − m from Eq. (24) = r + s + 1 r + s + 1 − m − n − 1 = r + s + 1 m + n + 1 from Eq. (6)

as we needed to show. □

▸ 21. [M05] Both sides of Eq. (25) are polynomials in s; why isn’t that equation an identity in s?

According to the text on page 57, any polynomial ∑ ⁡ 0≤k≤daksk can be expressed as ∑ ⁡ 0≤k≤dbks k for suitably chosen coefficients b0,b1,⋯,bd.

And so, the left hand of Eq. (25) can be expressed as

∑ 0≤k≤rr − k m s + k n = ∑ 0≤k≤naksk;

that is, a polynomial of degree at most n for suitably chosen coefficients a0,a1,⋯,an; and the right hand of Eq. (25) can be expressed as

r + s + 1 m + n + 1 = ∑ 0≤k≤m+n+1ak′sk;

that is, a polynomial of degree at most m + n + 1 for suitably chosen coefficients a0′,a1′,⋯,am+n+1′.

Therefore, even though both sides of Eq. (25) are polynomials in s, since they do not agree at all m + n + 1 possible points, the equation does not serve as an identity in s.

22. [M20] Prove Eq. (26) for the special case s = n − 1 − r + nt.

Proposition. ∑ ⁡ 0≤kr−tk k n−1−(r−tk) n−k r r−tk = n−1 n for integers n.

Proof. Let r, t, and n be arbtirary integers. We must show that

∑ 0≤kr − tk k n − 1 − (r − tk) n − k r r − tk = n − 1 n .

We consider two cases, depending on whether k ≤ r − tk or not.

Case 1. [k ≤ r − tk] In the case that k ≤ r − tk,

k ≤ r − tk ⇒ − (r − tk) ≤−k ⇒n − (r − tk) ≤ n − k ⇒n − 1 − (r − tk) < n − k ⇒n − 1 − (r − tk) n − k = 0

which gives us that

∑ 0≤kr − tk k n − 1 − (r − tk) n − k r r − tk = 0 = n − 1 n

in this case.

Case 2. [k > r − tk] In the case that k > r − tk, clearly

r − tk < k ⇒r − tk k = 0

which gives us that

∑ 0≤kr − tk k n − 1 − (r − tk) n − k r r − tk = 0 = n − 1 n

in this case.

Therefore, in either case, we have that

∑ 0≤kr − tk k n − 1 − (r − tk) n − k r r − tk = 0 = n − 1 n

as we needed to show. □

23. [M13] Assuming that Eq. (26) holds for (r,s,t,n) and (r,s − t,t,n − 1), prove it for (r,s + 1,t,n).

Proposition. If ∑ ⁡ 0≤kr−tk k s−t(n−k) n−k r r−tk = r−s−tn n and ∑ ⁡ 0≤kr−tk k s−t(n−k) n−k−1 r r−tk = r−s−tn n−1 , then ∑ ⁡ 0≤kr−tk k s−t(n−k)+1 n−k r r−tk = r−s−tn+1 n .

Proof. Let r, s, t, and n be arbitrary integers such that

∑ 0≤kr − tk k s − t(n − k) n − k r r − tk = r − s − tn n

and

∑ 0≤kr − tk k s − t(n − k) n − k − 1 r r − tk = r − s − tn n − 1 .

We must show that

∑ 0≤kr − tk k s − t(n − k) + 1 n − k r r − tk = r − s − tn + 1 n .

But

∑ 0≤kr − tk k s − t(n − k) + 1 n − k r r − tk = ∑ 0≤kr − tk k s − t(n − k) n − k + s − t(n − k) n − k − 1 r r − tk = ∑ 0≤kr − tk k s − t(n − k) n − k r r − tk + ∑ 0≤kr − tk k s − t(n − k) n − k − 1 r r − tk = r − s − tn n + r − s − tn n − 1 = r − s − tn + 1 n

as we needed to show. □

24. [M15] Explain why the results of the previous two exercises combine to give a proof of Eq. (26).

The results of the previous two exercises combine to give a proof of Eq. (26) as a proof by induction on n.

In the case that n < 0,

∑ 0≤kr − tk k s − t(n − k) n − k r r − tk = 0 = r + s − tn n ;

and in the case that n = 0,

∑ 0≤kr − tk k s − t(n − k) n − k r r − tk = r 0 s 0 r r = 1 = r + s 0 = r + s − tn n .

Otherwise, in the case that n > 0, we may construct a proof by induction on m ≥−1 with s = n − r + nt + m. If m = −1,

∑ 0≤kr − tk k s − t(n − k) n − k r r − tk = ∑ 0≤kr − tk k n − r + nt + m − t(n − k) n − k r r − tk = ∑ 0≤kr − tk k n − 1 − r + nt − t(n − k) n − k r r − tk = ∑ 0≤kr − tk k n − 1 − (r − tk) n − k r r − tk = n − 1 n by exercise 22 = n + m n = r + n − r + nt + m − tn n = r + s − tn n .

Then, assuming

∑ 0≤kr − tk k s − t(n − k) n − k r r − tk = r − s − tn n

and

∑ 0≤kr − tk k s − t(n − k) n − k − 1 r r − tk = r − s − tn n − 1 ,

we must show that

∑ 0≤kr − tk k s − t(n − k) + 1 n − k r r − tk = r − s − tn + 1 n .

But, by exercise 24

∑ 0≤kr − tk k s − t(n − k) + 1 n − k r r − tk = r − s − tn + 1 n

and hence the result.

25. [HM30] Let the polynomial An(x,t) be defined as in Eq. (30). Let z = xt+1 − xt. Prove that ∑ ⁡ kAk(r,t)zk = xr, provided z is small enough. [Note: If t = 0, this result is essentially the binomial theorm, and this equation is an important generalization of the binomial theorem. The binomial theorem (15) may be assumed in the proof.] Hint: Start with the identity

∑ j(−1)jk j r − jt k r r − jt = δk0.

Proposition. ∑ ⁡ kAk(r,t)zk = xr for z = xt+1 − xt sufficiently small.

Proof. Let An(x,t) be the nth degree polynomial in x that satisfies

An(x,t) = x − nt n x x − nt

for x≠nt; and z = xt+1 − xt sufficiently small. We must show that

∑ jAj(r,t)zj = xr.

We may first prove that the sum converges by using the ratio test; that is, that

lim ⁡ k→∞Ak+1(r,t)zk+1 Ak(r,t)zk < 1.

But if z is sufficiently small, z ≤ 1∕t, or equivalently, −tz < 1, then

1 > −tz = lim ⁡ k→∞(r − kt) (k + 1) z = lim ⁡ k→∞∏ 1≤j≤k(r − kt)(r − (k + 1)t)(r − kt + 1 − j) (r − (k + 1)t)(k + 1)(r − kt + 1 − j) z ≥ lim ⁡ k→∞∏ 1≤j≤k(r − kt)(r − (k + 1)t − k)(r − (k + 1)t + 1 − j) (r − (k + 1)t)(k + 1)(r − kt + 1 − j) z = lim ⁡ k→∞(r − kt)z(r − (k + 1)t − k)∏ 1≤j≤k(r − (k + 1)t + 1 − j) (r − (k + 1)t)(k + 1)∏ 1≤j≤k(r − kt + 1 − j) = lim ⁡ k→∞(r − kt)zr−(k+1)t−k k+1 ∏ 1≤j≤kr−(k+1)t+1−j j (r − (k + 1)t)∏ 1≤j≤kr−kt+1−j j = lim ⁡ k→∞(r − kt)z∏ 1≤j≤k+1r−(k+1)t+1−j j (r − (k + 1)t)∏ 1≤j≤kr−kt+1−j j = lim ⁡ k→∞r−(k+1)t k+1 (r − kt)z r−kt k (r − (k + 1)t) = lim ⁡ k→∞r−(k+1)t k+1 r r−(k+1)tz r−kt k r r−kt = lim ⁡ k→∞Ak+1(r,t)z Ak(r,t) = lim ⁡ k→∞Ak+1(r,t)zk+1 Ak(r,t)zk

and hence the proof of convergence.

Then, given the identity

∑ j(−1)jk j r − jt k r r − jt = δk0,

and letting x = 1∕(1 + w) so that z = −w∕(1 + w)t+1 = xt+1 − xt, we have that

1 = δ00 = ∑ kδk0wk = ∑ k ∑ j(−1)jk j r − jt k r r − jtwk = ∑ j(−1)j r r − jt∑ kk j r − jt k wk = ∑ j(−1)j r r − jt∑ kr − jt j r − jt − j k − j wk from Eq. (2) = ∑ j(−1)jr − jt j r r − jt∑ kr − jt − j k − j wk = ∑ j(−1)jA j(r,t)∑ kr − jt − j k − j wk = ∑ j(−1)jA j(r,t)∑ kr − jt − j k − j wk−jwj = ∑ j(−1)jA j(r,t)(1 + w)r−jt−jwj = ∑ j(−1)jA j(r,t)(1∕x)r−jt−j(1∕x − 1)j = ∑ jAj(r,t)(−1)j(1∕x)r−jt−j(1∕x − 1)j = ∑ jAj(r,t)(−1)j(1∕x − 1)j(1∕x)r−jt−j = ∑ jAj(r,t)(−1)j(1∕x − 1)j(1∕x)−jt−j(1∕x)r = ∑ jAj(r,t)(−(1∕x − 1))j((1∕x)−t−1)j(1∕x)r = ∑ jAj(r,t)((1 − 1∕x)xt+1)j(1∕x)r = ∑ jAj(r,t)(xt+1 − xt)j(1∕x)r = ∑ jAj(r,t)zj(1∕x)r;

or equivalently, that

∑ jAj(r,t)zj = xr

as we needed to show. □

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

H. W. Gould, AMM 63 (1956), 84–91.

26. [HM25] Using the assumptions of the previous exercise, prove that

∑ kr − tk k zk = xr+1 (t + 1)x − t.

Proposition. ∑ ⁡ kr−tk k zk = xr+1 (t+1)x−t.

Proof. Let An(x,t) be the nth degree polynomial in x from exercise 25 that satisfies

An(x,t) = x − nt n x x − nt

for x≠nt; and z = xt+1 − xt sufficiently small so that z ≤ 1∕t. We must show that

∑ kr − tk k zk = xr+1 (t + 1)x − t.

From exercise 25, we have that ∑ ⁡ kAk(r,t)zk = xr, or equivalently that

1 = ∑ kAk(r,t)zkx−r = ∑ kAk(r,t)(xt+1 − xt)kx−r = ∑ kAk(r,t)xtk−r(x − 1)k;

we have by definition that

1 = dz dz = d dz(xt+1 − xt) = ((t + 1)xt − txt−1)dx dz = xt−1((t + 1)x − t)dx dz

or equivalently that

dx dz = x xt((t + 1)x − t);

and we also have that d dz ∑ ⁡ kAk(r,t)zk = ∑ ⁡ kkAk(r,t)zk−1 = d(xr) dz , or equivalently that

∑ kkAk(r,t)zk = zd(xr) dz = (xt+1 − xt)rxr−1dx dz = (xt+1 − xt)rxr−1 x xt((t + 1)x − t) = rxr−1( x2 (t + 1)x − t − x (t + 1)x − t) = rxr x − 1 (t + 1)x − t.

Finally, diffirentiating the first equality yields

d dx1 = 0 = d dx ∑ kAk(r,t)xtk−r(x − 1)k = ∑ kAk(r,t) (x − 1)k(tk − r)(xtk−r−1) + xtk−rk(x − 1)k−1 = ∑ kAk(r,t) (tk − r)(x−r−1) + x−rk(x − 1)−1 (x − 1)kxtk = ∑ kAk(r,t) (tk − r)(x−r−1) + x−rk(x − 1)−1 zk = ∑ k(tk − r)(x−r−1)A k(r,t)zk + ∑ kx−rk(x − 1)−1A k(r,t)zk = ∑ k(tk − r)(x−r−1)r − kt k r r − ktzk + ∑ kx−rk(x − 1)−1A k(r,t)zk = ∑ k(−r)(x−r−1)r − kt k zk + ∑ kx−rk(x − 1)−1A k(r,t)zk = −rx−1 ∑ kr − kt k zk + (x − 1)−1 ∑ kkAk(r,t)zk = −rx−1 ∑ kr − kt k zk + (x − 1)−1rxr x − 1 (t + 1)x − t = −rx−1 ∑ kr − kt k zk + rxr (t + 1)x − t

if and only if

∑ kr − kt k zk = x r rxr (t + 1)x − t = xr+1 (t + 1)x − t

as we needed to show. □

27. [HM21] Solve Example 4 in the text by using the result of exercise 25, and prove Eq. (26) from the preceding two exercises. [Hint: See exercise 17.]

We may solve Example 4 from the text using the result of exercise 25.

Proposition. ∑ ⁡ kAk(r,t)An−k(s,t) = An(r + s,t) for nonnegative integers n.

Proof. Let An(x,t) be the nth degree polynomial in x from exercise 25 that satisfies

An(x,t) = x − nt n x x − nt

for x≠nt; and z = xt+1 − xt sufficiently small so that z ≤ 1∕t. We must show that

∑ kAk(r,t)An−k(s,t) = An(r + s,t).

From exercise 25, we have that ∑ ⁡ nAn(r + s,t)zn = xr+s. And so,

∑ n ∑ kAk(r,t)An−k(s,t)zn = ∑ n ∑ k ∑ j j=n−k Ak(r,t)Aj(s,t)zn = ∑ k ∑ j j=n−k Ak(r,t)Aj(s,t)zj+k = ∑ kAk(r,t)zk ∑ jAj(s,t)zj = xrxs = xr+s = ∑ nAn(r + s,t)zn = xr+s.

Equating coefficients yields

∑ kAk(r,t)An−k(s,t) = An(r + s,t)

as we needed to show. □

We may also prove Eq. (26) from the preceding two exercises.

Proposition. ∑ ⁡ k≥0r−tk k s−t(n−k) n−k r r−tk = r+s−tn n .

Proof. Let n be an arbitrary integer. We must show that

∑ k≥0r − tk k s − t(n − k) n − k r r − tk = r + s − tn n .

From exercise 25, we have that ∑ ⁡ k≥0Ak(r,t)zk = xr and from exercise 26, we have that ∑ ⁡ js−tj j zj = xs+1 (t+1)x−t. Multiplying both equations yields

xr xs+1 (t + 1)x − t = xr+s+1 (t + 1)x − t = ∑ k≥0Ak(r,t)zk ∑ js − tj j zj = ∑ k≥0Ak(r,t)zk ∑ n j=n−k s − t(n − k) n − k zn−k = ∑ n ∑ k≥0Ak(r,t)s − t(n − k) n − k zn = ∑ n ∑ k≥0r − kt k r r − kt s − t(n − k) n − k zn; = ∑ n ∑ k≥0r − kt k s − t(n − k) n − k r r − ktzn;

and again, from exercise 26,

xr+s+1 (t + 1)x − t = ∑ nr + s − tn n zn,

which gives us the equality

∑ n ∑ k≥0r − kt k s − t(n − k) n − k r r − ktzn = ∑ nr + s − tn n zn.

Finally, equating coefficients yields

∑ k≥0r − kt k s − t(n − k) n − k r r − kt = r + s − tn n ,

and hence the result. □

28. [M25] Prove that

∑ kr + tk k s − tk n − k = ∑ k≥0r + s − k n − k tk,

if n is a nonnegative integer.

Proposition. ∑ ⁡ kr+tk k s−tk n−k = ∑ ⁡ k≥0r+s−k n−k tk for n a nonnegative integer.

Proof. Let n be an arbitrary nonnegative integer. We must show that

∑ kr + tk k s − tk n − k = ∑ k≥0r + s − k n − k tk.

If n = 0,

∑ kr + tk k s − tk n − k = ∑ kr + tk k s − tk −k = 0 = ∑ k≥0r + s − k −k = ∑ k≥0r + s − k −k tk.

Then, assuming

∑ kr + tk k s − tk n − k = ∑ k≥0r + s − k n − k tk

we must show that

∑ kr + tk k s − tk n + 1 − k = ∑ k≥0 r + s − k n + 1 − ktk.

But from Eq. (26),

∑ kr + tk k s − tk n + 1 − k = ∑ kr + tk k s − tk n + 1 − k r + tk r + tk = ∑ kr + tk k s − tk n + 1 − k r r + tk + ∑ kr + tk k s − tk n + 1 − k tk r + tk = ∑ kr − (−t)k k (s − tn) − (−t)(n − k) n + 1 − k r r − (−t)k + ∑ kr + tk k s − tk n + 1 − k tk r + tk = r + (s − tn) − (−t)n n + 1 + ∑ kr + tk k s − tk n + 1 − k tk r + tk = r + s n + 1 + t∑ k k r + tk r + tk k s − tk n + 1 − k = r + s n + 1 + t∑ kr + tk − 1 k − 1 s − tk n + 1 − k = r + s n + 1 + t∑ kr + t(k + 1) − 1 k + 1 − 1 s − t(k + 1) n + 1 − (k + 1) = r + s n + 1 + t∑ kr + t − 1 + tk k s − t − tk) n − k = r + s n + 1 + t∑ k≥0r + t − 1 + s − t − k n − k tk = r + s n + 1 + t∑ k≥0r + s − k − 1 n − k tk = r + s n + 1 + ∑ k≥0 r + s − (k + 1) n + 1 − (k + 1)tk+1 = r + s − 0 n + 1 − 0t0 + ∑ k≥1 r + s − k n + 1 − ktk = ∑ k≥0 r + s − k n + 1 − ktk

as we needed to show. □

29. [M20] Show that Eq. (34) is just a special case of the general identity proved in exercise 1.2.3-33.

Eq. (34) for r ≥ 0 is

∑ kr k(−1)r−k ∑ 0≤j≤rbjkj = r!b r,

while the general identity proved in exercise 1.2.3-33 is

∑ 1≤k≤r kj ∏ 1≤i≤r i≠k (k − i) = 0 if 0 ≤ j < r − 1 1 if j = r − 1 ∑ 1≤k≤rkif j = r.

Thus,

∑ kr k(−1)r−k ∑ 0≤j≤rbjkj = ∑ 0≤k≤rr k(−1)r−k ∑ 0≤j≤rbjkj = ∑ 0≤j≤rbj ∑ 0≤k≤rr k(−1)r−kkj = ∑ 0≤j≤rbj ∑ 0≤k≤r r! k!(r − k)!(−1)r−kkj = r!∑ 0≤j≤rbj ∑ 0≤k≤r kj (−1)r−kk!(r − k)! = r!∑ 0≤j≤rbj ∑ 0≤k≤r kj ∏ 1≤i≤r−k(−1)∏ 1≤i≤ki∏ 1≤i≤r−ki = r!∑ 0≤j≤rbj ∑ 0≤k≤r kj ∏ 1≤i≤ki∏ 1≤i≤r−k(−i) = r!∑ 0≤j≤rbj ∑ 0≤k≤r kj ∏ 0≤i≤k−1(k − i)∏ k+1≤i≤r(k − i) = r!∑ 0≤j≤rbj ∑ 0≤k≤r kj ∏ 0≤i≤r i≠k (k − i) = r!∑ −1≤j≤r−1bj+1 ∑ 1≤k≤r kj ∏ 1≤i≤r i≠k (k − i) = r!br−1+1(1) = r!br

and hence the result.

▸ 30. [M24] Show that there is a better way to solve Example 3 than the way used in the text, by manipulating the sum so that Eq. (26) applies.

We wish to evaluate the sum from Example 3

∑ k n + k m + 2k 2k k (−1)k k + 1

for positive integers m and n, using Eq. (26)

∑ k≥01 + 2k k −m − 1 − 2k n − m − k 1 1 + 2k = −m n − m.

But

∑ k n + k m + 2k 2k k (−1)k k + 1 = ∑ k n + k m + 2k 2k k (−1)k k + 1 2k + 1 2k + 1 = ∑ k n + k m + 2k 2k + 1 k + 1 2k k (−1)k 2k + 1 = ∑ k≥0 n + k m + 2k 2k + 1 k + 1 (−1)k 2k + 1 from Eq. (7) = ∑ k≥0 n + k m + 2k 2k + 1 k (−1)k 2k + 1 from Eq. (6) = ∑ k≥0(−1)n+k−m−2k −(m + 2k + 1) n + k − m − 2k 2k + 1 k (−1)k 2k + 1 from Eq. (19) = ∑ k≥0−m − 2k − 1 n − m − k 2k + 1 k (−1)n−m−k(−1)k 2k + 1 = ∑ k≥0−m − 2k − 1 n − m − k 2k + 1 k (−1)n−m 2k + 1 = ∑ k≥0−m − 2k − 1 n − m − k 2k + 1 k (−1)n−m 2k + 1 = ∑ k≥01 + 2k k −m − 1 − 2k n − m − k (−1)n−m 1 + 2k = (−1)n−m −m n − m from Eq. (26) = (−1)n−mn − m − n + 1 − 1 n − m = n − 1 n − m from Eq. (17) = n − 1 n − 1 − n + m from Eq. (6) = n − 1 m − 1

and hence the result.

▸ 31. [M20] Evaluate

∑ km − r + s k n + r − s n − k r + k m + n

in terms of r, s, m, and n, given that m and n are integers. Begin by replacing

r + k m + nby∑ j r m + n − j k j .

We have

∑ km − r + s k n + r − s n − k r + k m + n = ∑ km − r + s k n + r − s n − k ∑ j r m + n − j k j = ∑ j ∑ km − r + s k k j n + r − s n − k r m + n − j = ∑ j ∑ km − r + s j m − r + s − j k − j n + r − s n − k r m + n − j from Eq. (20) = ∑ j ∑ km − r + s j m − r + s − j m − r + s − k n + r − s n − k r m + n − j from Eq. (6) = ∑ j ∑ km − r + s j m − r + s − j m − r + s − k n + r − s r − s + k r m + n − j from Eq. (6) = ∑ jm − r + s j r m + n − j∑ k m − r + s − j m − (k + r − s) n + r − s k + r − s = ∑ jm − r + s j r m + n − j∑ kn + r − s k m − r + s − j m − k = ∑ jm − r + s j r m + n − j n + m − j m from Eq. (21) = ∑ jm − r + s j r m r − m n − j from Eq. (20) = r m∑ jm − r + s j r − m n − j = r m s n. from Eq. (21)

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

J. F. Plaff, Nova Acta Acad. Scient. Petr. 11 (1797), 38–57.

32. [M20] Show that ∑ ⁡ kn k xk = xn¯, where xn¯ is the rising factorial power defined in Eq. 1.2.5-(19).

Proposition. ∑ ⁡ kn k xk = xn¯.

Proof. Let xn¯ be the rising factorial power defined as

xn¯ = ∏ 0≤k≤n−1(x + k).

We must show that

∑ kn kxk = xn¯.

But

∑ kn kxk = ∑ kn k (−1)k(−x)k = ∑ kn k (−1)−k(−x)k = ∑ kn k (−1)n−n(−1)−k(−x)k = ∑ kn k (−1)n(−1)n(−1)−k(−x)k = (−1)n ∑ kn k (−1)n−k(−x)k = (−1)n(−x)n̲ from Eq. (44) = xn¯ from Eq. 1.2.5-(20)

as we needed to show. □

33. [M20] (A. Vandermonde, 1772.) Show that the binomial formula is valid also when it involves factorial powers instead of the ordinary powers. In order words, prove that

(x + y)n̲ = ∑ kn kxk̲yn−k̲;(x + y)n¯ = ∑ kn kxk¯yn − k¯.

We may prove the formula for factorial falling.

Proposition. (x + y)n̲ = ∑ ⁡ kn k xk̲yn−k̲.

Proof. Let n be an arbitrary nonnegative integer. We must show that

(x + y)n̲ = ∑ kn kxk̲yn−k̲.

If n = 0,

(x + y)0̲ = 1 = 0 0x0̲y0̲ = ∑ k0 kxk̲y0−k̲.

Then, assuming

(x + y)n̲ = ∑ kn kxk̲yn−k̲

we must show that

(x + y)n+1̲ = ∑ kn + 1 k xk̲yn+1−k̲.

But

(x + y)n+1̲ = (x + y − n)(x + y)n̲ = (x + y − n)∑ kn kxk̲yn−k̲ = ∑ kn kxk̲yn−k̲((x − k) + (y − (n − k))) = ∑ kn kxk+1̲yn−k̲ + ∑ kn kxk̲yn+1−k̲ = ∑ k n k − 1xk̲yn+1−k̲ + ∑ kn kxk̲yn+1−k̲ = ∑ k n k − 1 + n kxk̲yn+1−k̲ = ∑ kn + 1 k xk̲yn+1−k̲ from Eq. (9)

as we needed to show. □

We may also prove the formula for factorial rising.

Proposition. (x + y)n¯ = ∑ ⁡ kn k xk¯yn − k¯.

Proof. Let n be an arbitrary nonnegative integer. We must show that

(x + y)n¯ = ∑ kn kxk¯yn − k¯.

If n = 0,

(x + y)0¯ = 1 = 0 0x0¯y0¯ = ∑ k0 kxk¯y0 − k¯.

Then, assuming

(x + y)n¯ = ∑ kn kxk¯yn − k¯

we must show that

(x + y)n + 1¯ = ∑ kn + 1 k xk¯yn + 1 − k¯.

But

(x + y)n + 1¯ = (x + y + n)(x + y)n¯ = (x + y + n)∑ kn kxk¯yn − k¯ = ∑ kn kxk¯yn − k¯((x + k) + (y + (n − k))) = ∑ kn kxk + 1¯yn − k¯ + ∑ kn kxk¯yn + 1 − k¯ = ∑ k n k − 1xk¯yn + 1 − k¯ + ∑ kn kxk¯yn + 1 − k¯ = ∑ k n k − 1 + n kxk¯yn + 1 − k¯ = ∑ kn + 1 k xk¯yn + 1 − k¯ from Eq. (9)

as we needed to show. □

34. [M23] (Torelli’s sum.) In the light of the previous exercise, show that Abel’s generalization, Eq. (16), of the binomial formula is true also for rising powers:

(x + y)n¯ = ∑ kn kx(x − kz + 1)k − 1¯(y + kz)n − k¯.

Proposition. (x + y)n¯ = ∑ ⁡ kn k x(x − kz + 1)k − 1¯(y + kz)n − k¯.

Proof. Let n be an arbitrary nonnegative integer and x an arbitrary nonzero real number. We must show that

(x + y)n¯ = ∑ kn kx(x − kz + 1)k − 1¯(y + kz)n − k¯.

Given the general identity for arbitrary a

an¯ = Γ(a + n) Γ(a) = (a + n)!a (a + n)a! = (a + n − 1)! (a − 1)! = (a + n − 1)! (a + n − 1 − n)! = n!(a + n − 1)! n!(a + n − 1 − n)! = n!(a + n − 1)! n!(a + n − 1 − n)! = n!a + n − 1 n ,

we have that

(x + y)n¯ = n!x + y + n − 1 n = n!∑ kx − (z − 1)k k y + nz − 1 − (z − 1)(n − k) n − k x x − (z − 1)k from Eq. (26) = n!∑ kx k k x − (z − 1)k x − (z − 1)k k y + nz − 1 − (z − 1)(n − k) n − k = n!∑ kx k x − (z − 1)k − 1 k − 1 y + nz − 1 − (z − 1)(n − k) n − k from Eq. (7) = n!∑ kx k x − (z − 1)k − 1 k − 1 y + kz + n − k − 1 n − k = ∑ k n! k!(n − k)!(k − 1)!(n − k)!xx − k(z − 1) − 1 k − 1 y + kz + n − k − 1 n − k = ∑ kn kx(k − 1)!x − kz + 1 + k − 1 − 1 k − 1 (n − k)!y + kz + n − k − 1 n − k = ∑ kn kx(x − kz + 1)k − 1¯(y + kz)n − k¯

as we needed to show. □

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

A. Vandermonde, Mém. Acad. Roy. Sci. (Paris, 1772), part 1, 492; C. Kramp, Élémens d’Arithmétique Universelle (Cologne: 1808), 359; G. Torelli, Giornale di Mat. Battaglini 33 (1895), 179–182; H. A. Rothe, Formulæde Serierum Reversione (Leipzig: 1793), 18.

35. [M23] Prove the addition formulas (46) for Stirling numbers directly from the definitions, Eqs. (44) and (45).

We may prove the addition formula for Stirling numbers of the first kind.

Proposition. n+1 m = n n m + n m−1.

Proof. Let m and n be arbitrary nonnegative integers. We must show that

n + 1 m = n n m + n m − 1.

But from Eq. (44),

∑ k(−1)n+1−kn + 1 k xk = xn+1̲ = (x − n)xn̲ = −nxn̲ + xxn̲ = −n∑ k(−1)n−kn kxk + x∑ k(−1)n−kn kxk = −n∑ k(−1)n−kn kxk + x∑ k(−1)n−(k−1) n k − 1xk−1 = ∑ k(−1)n+1−knn kxk + ∑ k(−1)n+1−k n k − 1xk = ∑ k(−1)n+1−k nn k + n k − 1xk

and hence the result equating coefficients. □

We may also prove the addition formula for Stirling numbers of the second kind.

Proposition. n+1 m = m n m + n m−1.

Proof. Let m and n be arbitrary nonnegative integers. We must show that

n + 1 m = m n m + n m − 1.

But from Eq. (45),

∑ kn + 1 k xk̲ = xn+1 = xxn = x∑ kn kxk̲ = ∑ kn kxxk̲ = ∑ kn k xxk̲ + kxk̲ − kxk̲ = ∑ kn k (x − k)xk̲ + kxk̲ = ∑ kn k xk+1̲ + kxk̲ = ∑ kn kkxk̲ + ∑ kn kxk+1̲ = ∑ kkn kxk̲ + ∑ k n k − 1xk̲ = ∑ k kn k + n k − 1xk̲

and hence the result equating coefficients. □

36. [M10] What is the sum ∑ ⁡ kn k of the numbers in each row of Pascal’s triangle? What is the sum of these numbers with alternating signs, ∑ ⁡ kn k (−1)k?

Assuming n a nonnegative integer, from Eq. (13),

∑ kn k = ∑ kn k 1k1n−k = (1 + 1)n = 2n,

and

∑ kn k (−1)k = ∑ kn k (−1)k1n−k = (−1 + 1)n = 0n = δn0.

37. [M10] From the answers to the preceding exercise, deduce the value of the sum of every other entry in a row, n 0 + n 2 + n 4 + ⋯.

Again assuming n a nonnegative integer, from the preceding exercise,

∑ k evenn k = ∑ kn k −∑ k oddn k = ∑ kn k + ∑ k evenn k −∑ k oddn k 2 = ∑ kn k + ∑ k evenn k (−1)k + ∑k oddn k (−1)k 2 = ∑ kn k + ∑ kn k (−1)k 2 = 2n + δn0 2 = 1 if n = 0 2n−1if n > 0.

38. [HM30] (C. Ramus, 1834.) Generalizing the result of the preceding exercise, show that we have the following formula, given that 0 ≤ k < m:

n k + n m + k + n 2m + k + ⋯ = 1 m∑ 0≤j<m 2cos ⁡ jπ m n cos ⁡ j(n − 2k)π m .

For example,

n 1 + n 4 + n 7 + ⋯ = 1 3 2n + 2cos ⁡ (n − 2)π 3 .

[Hint: Find the right combinations of these coefficients multiplied by mth roots of unity.] This identity is particularly remarkable when m ≥ n.

Proposition. ∑ ⁡ j≥0 n jm+k = 1 m ∑ ⁡ 0≤j<m 2cos ⁡ jπ m n cos ⁡ j(n−2k)π m .

Proof. Let k and m be arbitrary integers such that 0 ≤ k < m. We must show that

∑ j≥0 n jm + k = 1 m∑ 0≤j<m 2cos ⁡ jπ m n cos ⁡ j(n − 2k)π m .

Given ω = e2πi∕m and the sum of the geometric progression for t restricted such that t mod m = k,

∑ 0≤j<mωj(t−k) = ∑ 0≤j<m ωt−k j = ∑ 0≤j<m e2πi(t−k)∕m j = ∑ 0≤j<m (−1)2(t−k)∕m j = ∑ 0≤j<m 1(t−k)∕m j = [t − k ≡ 0(mod ⁡m)]∑ 0≤j<m1j = [t − k ≡ 0(mod ⁡m)]m

we have for the real part that

∑ j≥0 n jm + k = ∑ tmodm=kn t = ∑ t−k≡0(modm)n t = ∑ tn t [t − k ≡ 0(modm)] = ∑ tn t 1 m∑ 0≤j<mωj(t−k) = 1 m∑ 0≤j<mω−jk ∑ tn t ωjt = 1 m∑ 0≤j<mω−jk 1 + ωj n = 1 m∑ 0≤j<mω−jk ωj + 1n = 1 m∑ 0≤j<mω−jk ωj∕2ωj∕2 + ωj∕2ω−j∕2 n = 1 m∑ 0≤j<mω−jkωjn∕2 ωj∕2 + ω−j∕2 n = 1 m∑ 0≤j<mωj(n∕2−k) ωj∕2 + ω−j∕2 n = 1 m∑ 0≤j<me2πij(n∕2−k)∕m e2πij∕m2 + e−2πij∕m2 n = 1 m∑ 0≤j<meij(n−2k)π m eijπ m + e−ijπ m n = 1 m∑ 0≤j<m cos ⁡ j(n − 2k)π m 2cos ⁡ jπ m n = 1 m∑ 0≤j<m 2cos ⁡ jπ m n cos ⁡ j(n − 2k)π m

as we needed to show. □

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

C. Ramus, Crelle 11 (1834), 353–355; CMath, exercises 5.75 and 6.57.

39. [M10] What is the sum ∑ ⁡ kn k of the numbers in each row of Stirling’s first triangle? What is the sum of these numbers with alternating signs? (See exercise 36.)

Assuming n a nonnegative integer, from exercise 32 we have that

∑ kn k = ∑ kn k 1k = 1n¯ = ∏ 0≤j≤n−1(1 + j) from Eq. 1.2.5-(19) = ∏ 1≤j≤nj = n!

and from Eq. (44) we have that

∑ kn k (−1)k = ∑ kn k (−1)−k = ∑ kn k (−1)n−k−n = ∑ k(−1)n−kn k (−1)−n = ∑ k(−1)n−kn k (−1)n = ∑ k(−1)n−kn k 1k(−1)n = 1n̲(−1)n = ∏ 0≤j≤n−1(1 − j)(−1)n from Eq. 1.2.5-(18) = 1 if n = 0 −1 if n = 1 0 otherwise = δn0 − δn1.

40. [HM17] The beta function B(x,y) is defined for positive real numbers x, y by the formula B(x,y) = ∫ ⁡01tx−1(1 − t)y−1dt.

a)
Show that B(x,1) = B(1,x) = 1∕x.
b)
Show that B(x + 1,y) + B(x,y + 1) = B(x,y).
c)
Show that B(x,y) = ((x + y)∕y)B(x,y + 1).

Let x and y be arbitrary positive real numbers and define the beta function B(x,y) as

B(x,y) = ∫ 01tx−1(1 − t)y−1dt.
a)
We may show the first identity.

Proposition. B(x,1) = B(1,x) = 1∕x.

Proof. We must show that

B(x,1) = B(1,x) = 1∕x. (68)

But by definition, both

B(x,1) = ∫ 01tx−1(1 − t)1−1dt = −∫ 10(1 − t)x−1(1 − (1 − t))1−1dt = ∫ 01t1−1(1 − t)x−1dt = B(1,x)

and

B(x,1) = ∫ 01tx−1(1 − t)1−1dt = ∫ 01tx−1dt = tx x 01 = 1 x −0 x = 1 x

and hence the result. □

b)
We may show the second identity.

Proposition. B(x + 1,y) + B(x,y + 1) = B(x,y).

Proof. We must show that

B(x + 1,y) + B(x,y + 1) = B(x,y). (71)

But

B(x + 1,y) + B(x,y + 1) = ∫ 01tx+1−1(1 − t)y−1dt + ∫ 01tx−1(1 − t)y+1−1dt = ∫ 01 tx+1−1(1 − t)y−1 + tx−1(1 − t)y+1−1 dt = ∫ 01 ttx−1(1 − t)y−1 + (1 − t)tx−1(1 − t)y−1 dt = ∫ 01(t + 1 − t)tx−1(1 − t)y−1dt = ∫ 01tx−1(1 − t)y−1dt = B(x,y)

and hence the result. □

c)
We may show the third identity.

Proposition. B(x,y) = ((x + y)∕y)B(x,y + 1).

Proof. We must show that

B(x,y) = ((x + y)∕y)B(x,y + 1). (73)

But from integration by parts

−∫ 01txy(1 − t)y−1dt = tx(1 − t)y 01 −∫ 01xtx−1(1 − t)ydt

which gives us that

B(x + 1,y) = ∫ 01tx(1 − t)y−1dt = −tx(1 − t)y y 01 + x y∫ 01tx−1(1 − t)ydt = −tx(1 − t)y y 01 + x yB(x,y + 1) = −1x(1 − 1)y y + 0x(1 − 0)y y + x yB(x,y + 1) = x yB(x,y + 1).

Then, from (b)

B(x,y) = B(x + 1,y) + B(x,y + 1) = x yB(x,y + 1) + B(x,y + 1) = x + y y B(x,y + 1)

and hence the result. □

41. [HM22] We proved a relation between the gamma function and the beta function in exercise 1.2.5-19, by showing that Γm(x) = mxB(x,m + 1), if m is a positive integer.

a)
Prove that
B(x,y) = Γm(y)mx Γm(x + y)B(x,y + m + 1).
b)
Show that
B(x,y) = Γ(x)Γ(y) Γ(x + y) .

Define the gamma function for positive integers m as

Γm(x) = mxm! ∏ 0≤j≤m(x + j),

so that from exercise 1.2.5-19

Γm(x) = mxB(x,m + 1).
a)
We may prove the first identity.

Proposition. B(x,y) = Γm(y)mx Γm(x+y) B(x,y + m + 1).

Proof. Let m be a positive integer. We must show that

B(x,y) = Γm(y)mx Γm(x + y)B(x,y + m + 1).

As an initial corollary, we will first show for positive integers k that

B(x,y) = ∏ 0≤j<kx + y + j y + j B(x,y + k).

If k = 1 we have from exercise 40 (c) that

B(x,y) = x + y y B(x,y + 1) = ∏ 0≤j<kx + y + j y + j B(x,y + k).

Then, assuming

B(x,y) = ∏ 0≤j<kx + y + j y + j B(x,y + k)

we must show that

B(x,y) = ∏ 0≤j<k+1x + y + j y + j B(x,y + k + 1).

But again from exercise 40 (c)

B(x,y) = ∏ 0≤j<kx + y + j y + j B(x,y + k) = ∏ 0≤j<kx + y + j y + j x + y + k y + k B(x,y + k + 1) = ∏ 0≤j<k+1x + y + j y + j B(x,y + k + 1)

and hence the interim result. Then finally,

B(x,y) = ∏ 0≤j<m+1x + y + j y + j B(x,y + m + 1) = ∏ 0≤j≤mx + y + j y + j B(x,y + m + 1) = ∏ 0≤j≤m(x + y + j) ∏ 0≤j≤m(y + j) B(x,y + m + 1) = mx+ym!∏ 0≤j≤m(x + y + j) mx+ym!∏ 0≤j≤m(y + j) B(x,y + m + 1) = mym! ∏ 0≤j≤m(y + j) mx+ym! ∏ 0≤j≤m(x + y + j)mxB(x,y + m + 1) = Γm(y)mx Γm(x + y)B(x,y + m + 1)

as we needed to show. □

b)
We may show the second identity.

Proposition. B(x,y) = Γ(x)Γ(y) Γ(x+y) .

Proof. Let m be a positive integer. We must show that

B(x,y) = Γ(x)Γ(y) Γ(x + y) .

It is sufficient to show that

lim ⁡ m→∞mxB(x,y + m + 1) = Γ(x).

Note that B is monotonically decreasing for positive x and y. That is, if (x,y) ≤ (x,y + 1), then B(x,y) ≥ B(x,y + 1), since from exercise 40

x > 0 ∧ y > 0 ⇔x y ≥ 0 ⇔x y + 1 ≥ 1 ⇔x + y y ≥ 1 ⇔x + y y B(x,y + 1) ≥ B(x,y + 1) ⇔B(x,y) ≥ B(x,y + 1).

Then, since B is monotonically decreasing and from exercise 1.2.5-19,

y + m + 1 ≤ y + m + 1 < n + m + 2 ⇔B(x,y + m + 2) < B(x,y + m + 1) ≤ B(x,y + m + 1) ⇔ Γy+m+1(x) (y + m + 1)x < B(x,y + m + 1) ≤ Γy+m(x) (y + m)x ⇔ Γy+m+1(x) mx(1 + (y + 1)∕m)x < B(x,y + m + 1) ≤ Γy+m(x) mx(1 + y∕m)x ⇔ m y + m + 1xΓ y+m+1(x) < mxB(x,y + m + 1) ≤ m y + mxΓ y+m(x) ⇔lim ⁡ m→∞ m y + m + 1xΓ y+m+1(x) < lim ⁡ m→∞mxB(x,y + m + 1) ≤ lim ⁡ m→∞ m y + mxΓ y+m(x) ⇔lim ⁡ m→∞Γy+m+1(x) < lim ⁡ m→∞mxB(x,y + m + 1) ≤ lim ⁡ m→∞Γy+m(x) ⇔lim ⁡ m→∞Γm(x) < lim ⁡ m→∞mxB(x,y + m + 1) ≤ lim ⁡ m→∞Γm(x) ⇔Γ(x) < lim ⁡ m→∞mxB(x,y + m + 1) ≤ Γ(x) ⇔lim ⁡ m→∞mxB(x,y + m + 1) = Γ(x).

And so from (a),

B(x,y) = lim ⁡ m→∞ Γm(y)mx Γm(x + y)B(x,y + m + 1) = lim ⁡ m→∞mxB(x,y + m + 1)Γm(y) Γm(x + y) = Γ(x)Γ(y) Γ(x + y)

as we needed to show. □

42. [HM10] Express the binomial coefficient r k in terms of the beta function defined above. (This gives us a way to extend the definition to all real values of k.)

From exercise 41 (b) we have

r k = r! k!(r − k)! = (r + 2)!(k + 1)(r − k + 1) (r + 1)(r + 2)(k + 1)!(r − k + 1)! = Γ(r + 2) (r + 1)Γ(k + 1)Γ(r − k + 1) = Γ(k + 1 + r − k + 1) (r + 1)Γ(k + 1)Γ(r − k + 1) = 1 (r + 1)B(k + 1,r − k + 1).

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

L. Ramshaw, Inf. Proc. Letters 6 (1977), 223–226.

43. [HM20] Show that B(1∕2,1∕2) = π. (From exercise 41 we may now conclude that Γ(1∕2) = π.)

Proposition. B(1∕2,1∕2) = π.

Proof. Define the beta function B(x,y) as

B(x,y) = ∫ 01tx−1(1 − t)y−1dt.

We must show that

B(1∕2,1∕2) = π.

But for u = t1∕2, du = 1 2t1∕2 dt,

B(1∕2,1∕2) = ∫ 01t1∕2−1(1 − t)1∕2−1dt = ∫ 01 1 t1∕2(1 − t)1∕2dt = ∫ 01 2t1∕2 t1∕2(1 − u2)1∕2du = 2∫ 01 1 (1 − u2)1∕2du = 2 arcsin ⁡ u01 = 2(π∕2 − 0) = π

as we needed to show. □

44. [HM20] Using the generalized binomial coefficient suggested in exercise 42, show that

r 1∕2 = 22r+12r r π.

Proposition. r 1∕2 = 22r+12r r π.

Proof. As a corollary, we will prove Gauss’s multiplication formula. That is, that

Γ(nz) = (2π)(1−n)∕2nnz−1∕2 ∏ 0≤k≤n−1Γ z + k n.

By Stirling’s formula as m →∞, we have

Γ z + k n = z + k n − 1Γ z + k n − 1 = lim ⁡ m→∞mz+k∕n−1m!∏ 0≤j≤m−1 z + k n + j = lim ⁡ m→∞mz+k∕n−12πm m e m ∏ 0≤j≤m−1 z + k n + j = lim ⁡ m→∞mz+k∕n−1∕22π mn e m ∏ 0≤j≤m−1 nz + k + jn,

and

∏ 0≤k≤n−1Γ z + k n = lim ⁡ m→∞mnz−n∕2m∑ 0≤k≤n−1k∕n 2πn mn e mn ∏ 0≤k≤n−1 ∏ 0≤j≤m−1 nz + k + jn = lim ⁡ m→∞mnz−n∕2m∑ 0≤k≤n−1k∕n 2πn mn e mn ∏ 0≤j≤mn−1 nz + j = lim ⁡ m→∞mnz−1∕2 2πn mn e mn ∏ 0≤j≤mn−1 nz + j = lim ⁡ m→∞(m∕n)nz−1∕2 2πn (m∕n)n e (m∕n)n ∏ 0≤j≤(m∕n)n−1 nz + j = lim ⁡ m→∞mnz−1∕2n1∕2−nz 2πn m e m ∏ 0≤j≤m−1 nz + j = lim ⁡ m→∞mnz−1n1∕2−nz 2πn−12πm m e m ∏ 0≤j≤m−1 nz + j = lim ⁡ m→∞mnz−1n1∕2−nz 2πn−1m!∏ 0≤j≤m−1 nz + j = (2π)(n−1)∕2n1∕2−nz lim ⁡ m→∞mnz−1m!∏ 0≤j≤m−1 nz + j = (2π)(n−1)∕2n1∕2−nz(nz − 1)Γ(nz − 1) = (2π)(n−1)∕2n1∕2−nzΓ(nz),

and hence the result

Γ(nz) = (2π)(1−n)∕2nnz−1∕2 ∏ 0≤k≤n−1Γ z + k n.

For the proof, we must show that

r 1∕2 = 22r+12r r π.

But from exercise 42 and since Γ(3∕2) = Γ(1∕2)∕2 = π∕2,

r 1∕2 = 1 (r + 1)B(1∕2 + 1,r − 1∕2 + 1) = 1 (r + 1)B(3∕2,r + 1∕2) = Γ(3∕2 + r + 1∕2) (r + 1)Γ(3∕2)Γ(r + 1∕2) = Γ(r + 2) (r + 1)Γ(3∕2)Γ(r + 1∕2) = 2Γ(r + 2) (r + 1)πΓ(r + 1∕2)

and

2r r = 1 (2r + 1)B(r + 1,2r − r + 1) = 1 (2r + 1)B(r + 1,r + 1) = Γ(r + 1 + r + 1) (2r + 1)Γ(r + 1)Γ(r + 1) = Γ(2r + 2) (2r + 1)Γ(r + 1)Γ(r + 1).

Multiplying both equalities yields

r 1∕2 2r r = 2Γ(r + 2) (r + 1)πΓ(r + 1∕2) Γ(2r + 2) (2r + 1)Γ(r + 1)Γ(r + 1) = 2Γ(r + 2)Γ(2r + 2) (r + 1)πΓ(r + 1∕2)(2r + 1)Γ(r + 1)Γ(r + 1) = 2Γ(r + 2)(2r + 1)Γ(2r + 1) (r + 1)πΓ(r + 1∕2)(2r + 1)Γ(r + 1)Γ(r + 1) = 2Γ(r + 2)Γ(2r + 1) (r + 1)πΓ(r + 1∕2)Γ(r + 1)Γ(r + 1) = 2(r + 1)Γ(r + 1)Γ(2r + 1) (r + 1)πΓ(r + 1∕2)Γ(r + 1)Γ(r + 1) = 2Γ(2r + 1) πΓ(r + 1∕2)Γ(r + 1)

if and only if

r 1∕2 = 2Γ(2r + 1)πΓ(r + 1∕2)Γ(r + 1)2r r .

That is, it is sufficient to show that

Γ(2r + 1) Γ(r + 1)Γ(r + 1∕2) = 22r π.

But, by Guass’s multiplication formula,

Γ(2r + 1) Γ(r + 1)Γ(r + 1∕2) = 2r Γ(r + 1)Γ(r + 1∕2)Γ(2r) = 2r Γ(r + 1)Γ(r + 1∕2)(2π)(1−2)∕222r−1∕2 ∏ 0≤k≤2−1Γ r + k 2 = 2r Γ(r + 1)Γ(r + 1∕2)(2π)−1∕222r−1∕2Γ(r)Γ r + 1 2 = 22rrΓ(r)Γ(r + 1∕2) πΓ(r + 1)Γ(r + 1∕2) = 22rrΓ(r) πrΓ(r) = 22r π.

And so,

r 1∕2 = 2Γ(2r + 1)πΓ(r + 1∕2)Γ(r + 1)2r r = Γ(2r + 1) Γ(r + 1)Γ(r + 1∕2)2π2r r = 22r π2π2r r = 22r2ππ2r r = 22r+12r r π

as we needed to show. □

45. [HM21] Using the generalized binomial coefficient suggested in exercise 42, find lim ⁡ r→∞r k∕rk.

From exercise 42 and Stirling’s approximation,

lim ⁡ r→∞r k∕rk = lim ⁡ r→∞ 1 rk(r + 1)B(k + 1,r − k + 1) = lim ⁡ r→∞ Γ(k + 1 + r − k + 1) rk(r + 1)Γ(k + 1)Γ(r − k + 1) = lim ⁡ r→∞ Γ(r + 2) rk(r + 1)Γ(k + 1)Γ(r − k + 1) = 1 Γ(k + 1)lim ⁡ r→∞ (r + 1)Γ(r + 1) rk(r + 1)Γ(r − k + 1) = 1 Γ(k + 1)lim ⁡ r→∞ Γ(r + 1) rkΓ(r − k + 1) = 1 Γ(k + 1)lim ⁡ r→∞ r! rk(r − k)! = 1 Γ(k + 1)lim ⁡ r→∞ 2πr(r∕e)r rk2π(r − k)((r − k)∕e)r−k = 1 Γ(k + 1)lim ⁡ r→∞ r r − k 1 er er ek (r − k)krr rk(r − k)r = 1 Γ(k + 1)lim ⁡ r→∞ r r − k 1 ek ((r − k)∕r)k ((r − k)∕r)r = 1 Γ(k + 1)lim ⁡ r→∞ r r − k 1 ek (1 − k∕r)k (1 − k∕r)r = 1 Γ(k + 1) 1 ek lim ⁡ r→∞ 1 (1 − k∕r)r = 1 Γ(k + 1) 1 ek 1 e−k = 1 Γ(k + 1).

▸ 46. [M21] Using Stirling’s approximation, Eq. 1.2.5-(7), find an approximate value of x+y y , assuming that both x and y are large. In particular, find the approximate size of 2n n when n is large.

Assuming that both x and y are large, using Stirling’s approximation, we find that

x + y y = 1 (x + y + 1)B(x + 1,y + 1) = 1 (x + y + 1)B(y + 1,x + y − y + 1) = 1 (x + y + 1)B(y + 1,x + 1) = Γ(x + y + 2) (x + y + 1)Γ(y + 1)Γ(x + 1) = (x + y + 1)Γ(x + y + 1) (x + y + 1)Γ(x + 1)Γ(y + 1) = Γ(x + y + 1) Γ(x + 1)Γ(y + 1) = Γ(x + y + 1) Γ(x + 1)Γ(y + 1) = (x + y)! x!y! ≈ 2π(x + y)((x + y)∕e)x+y 2πx(x∕e)x2πy(y∕e)y = x + y 2πxy (x + y)x(x + y)yexey xxyyex+y = 1 2π 1 x + 1 y 1 + y xx 1 + x yy.

In particular, when n is large,

2n n = n + n n ≈ 1 2π 1 n + 1 n 1 + n nn 1 + n nn = 1 2π 2 n 2n 2n = 22n πn = 4n πn.

47. [M21] Given that k is an integer, show that

r k r − 1∕2 k = 2r k 2r − k k 4k = 2r 2k 2k k 4k.

Give a simpler formula for the special case r = −1∕2.

We may prove the equalities.

Proposition. r k r−1∕2 k = 2r k 2r−k k 4k = 2r 2k 2k k 4k for integer k.

Proof. Let k be an arbitrary integer. We must show that

r k r − 1∕2 k = 2r k 2r − k k 4k = 2r 2k 2k k 4k.

In the case that k < 0, we have

r k r − 1∕2 k = 0 = 2r k 2r − k k 4k;

and in the case that k = 0, we have

r k r − 1∕2 k = 1 = 2r k 2r − k k 4k.

That is, in the case that k ≤ 0, we have

r k r − 1∕2 k = δk0 = 2r k 2r − k k 4k.

In the case that k = r, we have

r k r − 1∕2 k = k − 1∕2 k = 1 (k − 1∕2 + 1)B(k + 1,k − 1∕2 − k + 1) = 1 (k + 1∕2)B(k + 1,1∕2) = Γ(k + 1 + 1∕2) (k + 1∕2)Γ(k + 1)Γ(1∕2) = Γ(k + 1∕2) Γ(k + 1)Γ(1∕2) = Γ(1∕2)Γ(k + 1∕2) Γ(1∕2)2Γ(k + 1) = Γ(1∕2)Γ(k + 1∕2) πΓ(k + 1) = 2(k + 1)Γ(3∕2)Γ(k + 1∕2) πΓ(3∕2 + k + 1∕2) = 2(k + 1)B(3∕2,k + 1∕2) π = 2 1 (k + 1)B(1∕2 + 1,k − 1∕2 + 1)π = 2 k 1∕2π = 22k+1 k 1∕2π4k = 2k k 4k.

It remains to consider the case when 0 < k≠r. Assuming

r k r − 1∕2 k = 2r k 2r − k k 4k

we must show that

r k + 1 r − 1∕2 k + 1 = 2r k + 1 2r − (k + 1) k + 1 4k+1.

As a corollary, note that from Eqs. (7) and (8) with 0≠k≠r we have

r k = r k r − 1 k − 1 = r k r − k + 1 r r k − 1 = r − k + 1 k r k − 1.

Then

r k + 1 r − 1∕2 k + 1 = r k + 1 r − 1∕2 k + 1 = r − (k + 1) + 1 k + 1 r (k + 1) − 1 r − 1∕2 − (k + 1) + 1 k + 1 r − 1∕2 (k + 1) − 1 = (r − k)(r − k − 1∕2) (k + 1)2 r k r − 1∕2 k = (r − k)(r − k − 1∕2) (k + 1)2 2r k 2r − k k 4k = 4(r − k)(r − k − 1∕2) 4(k + 1)2 2r k 2r − k k 4k = 2(2r − k)(r − k − 1∕2) 4(k + 1)2 2r k 2(r − k) 2r − k 2r − k k 4k = 2(2r − k)(r − k − 1∕2) 4(k + 1)2 2r k 2r − k − 1 k 4k = 1 4 2r − (k + 1) + 1 k + 1 2r (k + 1) − 1 (2r − k − 1) − (k + 1) + 1 k + 1 2r − k − 1 (k + 1) − 14k = 1 4 2r k + 1 2r − k − 1 k + 1 4k = 2r k + 1 2r − k − 1 k + 1 4k+1 = 2r k + 1 2r − (k + 1) k + 1 4k+1.

That is, for k an arbitrary integer

r k r − 1∕2 k = 2r k 2r − k k 4k.

And finally, from Eq. (20)

2r k 2r − k k 4k = 2r k 2r − k 2k − k4k = 2r 2k 2k k 4k

as we needed to show. □

For the special case r = −1∕2, we have the simpler equalities

−1∕2 k −1∕2 − 1∕2 k = −1∕2 k −1 k = −2∕2 k −2∕2 − k k 4k = −1 k −1 − k k 4k = −2∕2 2k 2k k 4k = −1 2k 2k k 4k

if and only if, from Eq. (17)

−1∕2 k = −1 2k 2k k 4k−1 k = (−1)2k2k−(−1)−1 2k 2k k 4k−1 k = 2k k 4k−1 k = 2k k 4k(−1)kk−(−1)−1 k = 2k k 4k(−1)k = − 1 4 k2k k .

That is, we have the simpler formula

−1∕2 k = − 1 4 k2k k .

▸ 48. [M25] Show that

∑ k≥0n k (−1)k k + x = n! x(x + 1)…(x + n) = 1 xn+x n ,

if the denominators are not zero. [Note that this formula gives us the reciprocal of a binomial coefficient, as well as the partial fraction expansion of 1∕x(x + 1)… ⁡(x + n).]

Proposition. ∑ ⁡ k≥0n k (−1)k k+x = n! ∏ ⁡ 0≤j≤nx+j = 1 xn+x n .

Proof. Let n and k be arbitrary, nonnegative integers. We must show that

∑ k≥0n k (−1)k k + x = n! ∏ 0≤j≤nx + j = 1 xn+x n .

First, note that

n! ∏ 0≤j≤nx + j = n! xn + 1¯ = n! (x + n + 1 − 1)n+1̲ = n! (x + n)n+1̲ = n!(x + n − (n + 1))! (x + n)! = n!(x − 1)! (x + n)! = n!x! x(n + x)! = n!(n + x − n)! x(n + x)! = 1 xn+x n .

Then, if n = 0,

∑ k≥0n k (−1)k k + x = 0 0 (−1)0 0 + x = 1 x = 1 x0+x 0 .

Assuming

∑ k≥0n k (−1)k k + x = n! ∏ 0≤j≤nx + j = 1 xn+x n

we must show that

∑ k≥0n + 1 k (−1)k k + x = (n + 1)! ∏ 0≤j≤n+1x + j = 1 xn+1+x n+1 .

But

∑ k≥0n + 1 k (−1)k x + k = ∑ 0≤k≤n+1n + 1 k (−1)k x + k = n + 1 n + 1 (−1)n+1 x + n + 1 + ∑ 0≤k≤nn + 1 k (−1)k x + k = (−1)n+1 x + n + 1 + ∑ 0≤k≤nn + 1 k (−1)k x + k = (−1)n+1 x + n + 1 + ∑ 0≤k≤n n k + n k − 1 (−1)k x + k = (−1)n+1 x + n + 1 + ∑ 0≤k≤nn k (−1)k x + k + ∑ 0≤k≤n n k − 1 (−1)k x + k = (−1)n+1 x + n + 1 + ∑ 0≤k≤nn k (−1)k x + k + ∑ −1≤k≤n−1n k (−1)k+1 x + k + 1 = (−1)n+1 x + n + 1 + ∑ 0≤k≤nn k (−1)k x + k −∑ −1≤k≤n−1n k (−1)k (x + 1) + k = (−1)n+1 x + n + 1 − n −1 − 1 x + n n (−1)n x + n + 1 + ∑ 0≤k≤nn k (−1)k x + k −∑ 0≤k≤nn k (−1)k (x + 1) + k = (−1)n+1 + (−1)n x + n + 1 − n −1 − 1 x + ∑ 0≤k≤nn k (−1)k x + k −∑ 0≤k≤nn k (−1)k (x + 1) + k = ∑ 0≤k≤nn k (−1)k x + k −∑ 0≤k≤nn k (−1)k (x + 1) + k = 1 xn+x n − 1 (x + 1)n+(x+1) n = n!x! x(n + x)! − n!(x + 1)! (x + 1)(n + x + 1)! = n!x!(x + 1)(n + x + 1) x(x + 1)(n + x)!(n + x + 1) − n!x(x + 1)! x(x + 1)(n + x + 1)! = n!(x − 1)!(n + x + 1) (n + x + 1)! − n!x! (n + x + 1)! = n!(x − 1)!(n + x + 1) − n!x! (n + x + 1)! = n!(x − 1)!(n + x + 1) − n!(x − 1)!x (n + x + 1)! = n!(x − 1)!(n + 1) (n + x + 1)! = (n + 1)!(x − 1)! (n + x + 1)! = (n + 1)!((n + 1 + x) − (n + 1))! x(n + 1 + x)! = 1 xn+1+x n+1

as we needed to show. □

49. [M20] Show that the identity (1 + x)r = (1 − x2)r(1 − x)−r implies a relation on binomial coefficients.

Given

(1 + x)r = (1 − x2)r(1 − x)−r

and the binomial theorem, we have that

∑ 0≤m r mxm = (1 + x)r = (1 − x2)r(1 − x)−r = ∑ 0≤k≤rr k(−1)kx2k ∑ 0≤l−r l (−1)lxl = ∑ 0≤k≤r ∑ 0≤lr k −r l (−1)k+lx2k+l = ∑ 0≤k≤r ∑ 0≤m−2kr k −r m − 2k(−1)k+m−2kxm = ∑ 0≤k≤r ∑ 2k≤mr k −r m − 2k(−1)m−kxm = ∑ 0≤k≤r ∑ 2k≤mr k −r m − 2k(−1)m+kxm = ∑ 0≤k≤r ∑ 2k≤mr k −r m − 2k(−1)m+kxm + 0 = ∑ 0≤k≤r ∑ 2k≤mr k −r m − 2k(−1)m+kxm + ∑ 0≤m<2kr k −r m − 2k(−1)m+kxm = ∑ 0≤k≤r ∑ 0≤mr k −r m − 2k(−1)m+kxm = ∑ 0≤m ∑ 0≤k≤rr k −r m − 2k(−1)m+kxm

which implies the relation

r m = ∑ 0≤k≤rr k −r m − 2k(−1)m+k

for integer m.

50. [M20] Prove Abel’s formula, Eq. (16), in the special case x + y = 0.

Proposition. (x + y)n = ∑ ⁡ 0≤k≤nn k x(x − kz)k−1(y + kz)n−k for integer n ≥ 0, x≠0, x + y = 0.

Proof. Let n be an arbitrary nonnegative integer and x, y, z arbitrary reals such that x≠0, x + y = 0. We must show that

(x + y)n = ∑ 0≤k≤nn kx(x − kz)k−1(y + kz)n−k;

or equivalently, since x + y = 0, that

δn,0 = ∑ 0≤k≤nn kx(x − kz)k−1(−x + kz)n−k.

But by the binomial theorem and Eq. (34)

∑ 0≤k≤nn kx(x − kz)k−1(−x + kz)n−k = ∑ 0≤k≤nn kx(x − kz)k−1(−1)n−k(x − kz)n−k = ∑ 0≤k≤nn k (−1)n−k(x − kz)k−1+n−kx = ∑ 0≤k≤nn k (−1)n−k(x − kz)n−1x = ∑ 0≤k≤nn k (−1)n−kx(x − zk)n−1 = ∑ 0≤k≤nn k (−1)n−kx∑ 0≤m≤n−1n − 1 m xn−1−m(−zk)m = ∑ 0≤k≤nn k (−1)n−k ∑ 0≤m≤n−1n − 1 m xn−m(−1)mzmkm = n!n − 1 n xn−n(−1)nzn = δn,0

as we needed to show. □

51. [M21] Prove Abel’s formula, Eq. (16), by writing y = (x + y) − x, expanding the right-hand side in powers of (x + y), and applying the result of the previous exercise.

Proposition. (x + y)n = ∑ ⁡ 0≤kn k x(x − kz)k−1(y + kz)n−k for integer n ≥ 0, x≠0, x + y = 0.

Proof. Let n be an arbitrary nonnegative integer and x, y, z arbitrary reals such that x≠0, x + y = 0. We must show that

∑ 0≤kn kx(x − kz)k−1(y + kz)n−k = (x + y)n;

or equivalently, since x + y = x + y⇒y = (x + y) − x, that

∑ 0≤kn kx(x − kz)k−1((x + y) − x + kz)n−k = (x + y)n.

But from Eq. (6), the binomial theorem, Eq. (20), and exercise 50

∑ 0≤kn kx(x − kz)k−1((x + y) − x + kz)n−k = ∑ 0≤k n n − kx(x − kz)k−1((x + y) − x + kz)n−k = ∑ 0≤k n n − kx(x − kz)k−1((x + y) + (−x + kz))n−k = ∑ 0≤k n n − kx(x − kz)k−1 ∑ 0≤mn − k m (x + y)m(−x + kz)n−k−m = ∑ 0≤k ∑ 0≤m n n − k n − k m (x + y)mx(x − kz)k−1(−x + kz)n−k−m = ∑ 0≤k ∑ 0≤m n m n − m n − m − k(x + y)mx(x − kz)k−1(−x + kz)n−k−m = ∑ 0≤m n m(x + y)m ∑ 0≤k n − m n − m − kx(x − kz)k−1(−x + kz)n−k−m = ∑ 0≤m n m(x + y)mδ n−m,0 = n n(x + y)n = (x + y)n

as we needed to show. □

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

A. Hurwitz, Acta Mathematica 26 (1902), 199–203.

52. [HM11] Prove that Abel’s binomial formula (16) is not always valid when n is not a nonnegative integer, by evaluating the right-hand side when n = x = −1, y = z = 1.

We may prove that Abel’s binomial formula

(x + y)n = ∑ 0≤kn kx(x − kz)k−1(y + kz)n−k

is not always valid when n < 0 by evaluating the particular case when n = x = −1, y = z = 1; and

∑ 0≤kn kx(x − kz)k−1(y + kz)n−k = ∑ 0≤k−1 k (−1)((−1) − k)k−1(1 + k)−1−k = ∑ 0≤k−1 k (−1)k(k + 1)k−1(k + 1)−k−1 = ∑ 0≤k−1 k (−1)k(k + 1)−2 = ∑ 0≤k(k + 1)−2 from Eq. (17) = ∑ 1≤kk−2

where ∑ ⁡ 1≤kk−2 is the Riemann zeta function ζ(−2) = π2∕6≠0 = (−1 + 1)−1 = (x + y)n.

53. [M25] (a) Prove the following identity by induction on m, where m and n are integers:

∑ k=0mr k s n − k(nr − (r + s)k) = (m + 1)(n − m) r m + 1 s n − m.

(b) Making use of important relations from exercise 47,

−1∕2 n = (−1)n 22n 2n n ,1∕2 n = (−1)n−1 22n(2n − 1) 2n n = (−1)n−1 22n−1(2n − 1) 2n − 1 n − δn0,

show that the following formula can be obtained as a special case of the identity in part (a):

∑ k=0m2k − 1 k 2n − 2k n − k − 1 2k − 1 = n − m 2n 2m m 2n − 2m n − m + 1 2 2n n .

(This result is considerably more general than Eq. (26) in the case r = −1, s = 0, t = −2.)

a)
We may prove the identity by induction.

Proposition. ∑ ⁡ k=0mr k s n−k(nr − (r + s)k) = (m + 1)(n − m) r m+1 s n−m for integers m, n.

Proof. Let m and n be arbitrary integers such that m is nonnegative. We must show that

∑ k=0mr k s n − k(nr − (r + s)k) = (m + 1)(n − m) r m + 1 s n − m.

If m = 0

∑ k=0mr k s n − k(nr − (r + s)k) = ∑ k=00 r k s n − k(nr − (r + s)k) = r 0 s n − 0(nr − (r + s)(0)) = r 0 s n(nr) = s n(nr) = nr s n = nr1!(r − 1)! 1!(r − 1)! s n = nr (r − 1)! 1!(r − 1)! s n = n r! 1!(r − 1)! s n = nr 1 s n = (1)(n)r 1 s n = (0 + 1)(n − 0) r 0 + 1 s n − 0 = (m + 1)(n − m) r m + 1 s n − m.

Then, assuming

∑ k=0mr k s n − k(nr − (r + s)k) = (m + 1)(n − m) r m + 1 s n − m

we must show that

∑ k=0m+1 r k s n − k(nr − (r + s)k) = ((m + 1) + 1)(n − (m + 1)) r (m + 1) + 1 s n − (m + 1).

But from the inductive hypothesis as well as Eqs. (7) and (8)

∑ k=0m+1 r k s n − k(nr − (r + s)k) = ∑ k=0mr k s n − k(nr − (r + s)k) + r m + 1 s n − (m + 1)(nr − (r + s)(m + 1)) = (m + 1)(n − m) r m + 1 s n − m + r m + 1 s n − (m + 1)(nr − (r + s)(m + 1)) = (m + 1)(n − m) r m + 1 s n − m s − 1 n − m − 1 + r m + 1 s n − (m + 1)(nr − (r + s)(m + 1)) = (m + 1)s r m + 1 s − 1 n − m − 1 + r m + 1 s n − (m + 1)(nr − (r + s)(m + 1)) = (m + 1)s r m + 1 s − (n − m − 1) s s n − m − 1 + r m + 1 s n − (m + 1)(nr − (r + s)(m + 1)) = (m + 1)(s − n + m + 1) r m + 1 s n − (m + 1) + r m + 1 s n − (m + 1)(nr − (r + s)(m + 1)) = (m + 1)(s − n + m + 1) + (nr − (r + s)(m + 1)) r m + 1 s n − (m + 1) = (m + 1)((s − n + m + 1) − (r + s)) + nr r m + 1 s n − (m + 1) = (m + 1)(−r − n + m + 1) + nr r m + 1 s n − (m + 1) = (nr + (−r − n + m + 1)(m + 1)) r m + 1 s n − (m + 1) = (nr − r(m + 1) − n(m + 1) + (m + 1)2) r m + 1 s n − (m + 1) = (n − (m + 1))(r − (m + 1)) r m + 1 s n − (m + 1) = r(n − (m + 1))r − (m + 1) r r m + 1 s n − (m + 1) = r(n − (m + 1)) r − 1 m + 1 s n − (m + 1) = ((m + 1) + 1)(n − (m + 1)) r (m + 1) + 1 r − 1 m + 1 s n − (m + 1) = ((m + 1) + 1)(n − (m + 1)) r (m + 1) + 1 s n − (m + 1)

as we needed to show. □

b)
We may derive the formula as a special case of the identity in part (a).

Given the relations from exercise 47, since

1∕2 n = (−1)n−1 22n−1(2n − 1) 2n − 1 n − δn0 ⇔2n − 1 n = 1∕2 n + δn0 22n−1(2n − 1) (−1)n−1

and

−1∕2 n = (−1)n 22n 2n n ⇔2n n = −1∕2 n 22n (−1)n

we have that

∑ k=0m2k − 1 k 2n − 2k n − k − 1 2k − 1 = ∑ k=0m 1∕2 k + δk0 22k−1(2k − 1) (−1)k−1 2n − 2k n − k − 1 2k − 1 = ∑ k=0m 1∕2 k + δk0 22k−1(−1)k2n − 2k n − k = ∑ k=0m 1∕2 k + δk0 22k−1(−1)k2(n − k) n − k = ∑ k=0m 1∕2 k + δk0 22k−1(−1)k −1∕2 n − k 22(n−k) (−1)n−k = ∑ k=0m 1∕2 k + δk0 22n−1(−1)n −1∕2 n − k = (−1)n22n−1 ∑ k=0m 1∕2 k −1∕2 n − k + δk0 −1∕2 n − k = (−1)n22n−1 ∑ k=0m1∕2 k −1∕2 n − k + −1∕2 n .

Then, setting r = 1 2, s = −1 2 in the result of (a) yields

∑ k=0m1∕2 k −1∕2 n − k(n∕2 − (1∕2 − 1∕2)k) = ∑ k=0m1∕2 k −1∕2 n − k(n∕2) = (m + 1)(n − m) 1∕2 m + 1 −1∕2 n − m

so that, again with the relations from exercise 47, as well as Eqs. (7) and (8),

(−1)n22n−1 ∑ k=0m1∕2 k −1∕2 n − k + −1∕2 n = (−1)n22n−1 2(m + 1)(n − m) n 1∕2 m + 1 −1∕2 n − m + −1∕2 n = (−1)n22n−12(m + 1)(n − m) n (−1)m+1−1 22(m+1)(2(m + 1) − 1) 2(m + 1) m + 1 (−1)n−m 22(n−m) 2(n − m) n − m + (−1)n22n−1(−1)n 22n 2n n = (m + 1)(n − m) 22n(2m + 1) 2m + 2 m + 1 2n − 2m n − m + 1 2 2n n = (m + 1)(n − m) 22n(2m + 1) 2m + 2 m + 1 2m + 1 m 2n − 2m n − m + 1 2 2n n = (m + 1)(n − m) 2n(2m + 1) 2m + 1 m 2n − 2m n − m + 1 2 2n n = (m + 1)(n − m) 2n(2m + 1) 2m + 1 2m + 1 − m 2m + 1 − 1 m 2n − 2m n − m + 1 2 2n n = n − m 2n 2m m 2n − 2m n − m + 1 2 2n n .

Hence

∑ k=0m2k − 1 k 2n − 2k n − k − 1 2k − 1 = n − m 2n 2m m 2n − 2m n − m + 1 2 2n n .

54. [M21] Consider Pascal’s triangle (as shown in Table 1) as a matrix. What is the inverse of that matrix?

Let

An+1 = [aij]n+1 = i jn+1 = 0 0 0 1 ⋯ 0 n 1 0 1 1 ⋯ 1 n ⋮ ⁡ ⋮ ⁡ ⋱ ⋮ ⁡ n 0 n 1 ⋯n n n+1

represent Pascal’s triangle as a matrix. We want to find another matrix Bn+1 = [bij]n+1 such that

An+1Bn+1 = Bn+1An+1 = In+1 = δij n+1.

But by the definition of matrix multiplication

Bn+1An+1 = ∑ 0≤k≤nbikakj = ∑ 0≤k≤nbikk j = δij = ∑ 0≤k≤i i k k j (−1)i−k from Eq. (33) = ∑ 0≤k≤n i k k j (−1)i+k = ∑ 0≤k≤n(−1)i+k i k k j .

Hence, for arbitrary k, 0 ≤ k ≤ n

bikk j = (−1)i+k i k k j ⇔bik = (−1)i+k i k

and in particular for k = j

bij = (−1)i+j i j

as we wanted to find, so that the inverse matrix is given by

Bn+1 = [bij]n+1 = (−1)i+j i jn+1 = 0 0 −0 1 ⋯ (−1)n 0 n −1 0 1 1 ⋯(−1)1+n 1 n ⋮ ⁡ ⋮ ⁡ ⋱ ⋮ ⁡ (−1)nn 0 (−1)n+1n 1 ⋯ n n n+1.

55. [M21] Considering each of Stirling’s triangles (Table 2) as matrices, determine their inverses.

Let

An+1 = [aij]n+1 = i jn+1 = 0 0 0 1 ⋯ 0 n 1 0 1 1 ⋯ 1 n ⋮ ⁡ ⋮ ⁡ ⋱ ⋮ ⁡ n 0 n 1 ⋯n n n+1

represent Stirling’s triangle of the first kind as a matrix. We want to find another matrix Bn+1 = [bij]n+1 such that

An+1Bn+1 = Bn+1An+1 = In+1 = δij n+1.

But by the definition of matrix multiplication

Bn+1An+1 = ∑ 0≤k≤nbikakj = ∑ 0≤k≤nbikk j = δij = δji = ∑ 0≤k≤i i k k j (−1)i−k from Eq. (47) = ∑ 0≤k≤n(−1)i+k i k k j .

Hence, for arbitrary k, 0 ≤ k ≤ n

bikk j = (−1)i+k i k k j ⇔bik = (−1)i+k i k

and in particular for k = j

bij = (−1)i+j i j

as we wanted to find, so that the inverse matrix is given by

Bn+1 = [bij]n+1 = (−1)i+j i jn+1 = 0 0 −0 1 ⋯ (−1)n 0 n −1 0 1 1 ⋯(−1)1+n 1 n ⋮ ⁡ ⋮ ⁡ ⋱ ⋮ ⁡ (−1)nn 0 (−1)n+1n 1 ⋯ n n n+1.

Similarly, let

An+1′ = [a ij′] n+1 = i jn+1 = 0 0 0 1 ⋯ 0 n 1 0 1 1 ⋯ 1 n ⋮ ⁡ ⋮ ⁡ ⋱ ⋮ ⁡ n 0 n 1 ⋯n n n+1

represent Stirling’s triangle of the second kind as a matrix. We want to find another matrix Bn+1′ = [bij′]n+1 such that

An+1′B n+1′ = B n+1′A n+1′ = I n+1 = δij n+1.

But by the definition of matrix multiplication

Bn+1′A n+1′ = ∑ 0≤k≤nbik′a kj′ = ∑ 0≤k≤nbik′k j = δij = δji = ∑ 0≤k≤i i k k j (−1)i−k from Eq. (47) = ∑ 0≤k≤n(−1)i+k i k k j .

Hence, for arbitrary k, 0 ≤ k ≤ n

bik′k j = (−1)i+k i k k j ⇔bik′ = (−1)i+k i k

and in particular for k = j

bij′ = (−1)i+j i j

as we wanted to find, so that the inverse matrix is given by

Bn+1′ = [b ij′] n+1 = (−1)i+j i jn+1 = 0 0 −0 1 ⋯ (−1)n 0 n −1 0 1 1 ⋯(−1)1+n 1 n ⋮ ⁡ ⋮ ⁡ ⋱ ⋮ ⁡ (−1)nn 0 (−1)n+1n 1 ⋯ n n n+1.

56. [20] (The combinatorial number system.) For each integer n = 0,1,2,… ⁡,20, find three integers a,b,c for which n = a 3 + b 2 + c 1 and a > b > c ≥ 0. Can you see how this pattern can be continued for higher values of n?

We may evaluate the largest values for a, b, and c that satisfy the constraint such that a > b > c ≥ 0.

abcn




2 1 0 0
3 1 0 1
3 2 0 2
3 2 1 3
4 1 0 4
4 2 0 5
4 2 1 6
4 3 0 7
4 3 1 8
4 3 2 9
5 1 0 10
5 2 0 11
5 2 1 12
5 3 0 13
5 3 1 14
5 3 2 15
5 4 0 16
5 4 1 17
5 4 2 18
5 4 3 19
6 1 0 20

This pattern can be continued for higher values of n by the following method: let a be the largest integer that satisfies a 3 ≤ n; b the largest that satisfies b 2 ≤ n − a 3 ; and c that satisfies c 1 ≤ n − a 3 − b 2.

▸ 57. [M22] Show that the coefficient am in Stirling’s attempt at generalizing the factorial function, Eq. 1.2.5-(12), is

(−1)m m! ∑ k≥1(−1)km − 1 k − 1 ln ⁡ k.

Proposition. am = (−1)m m! ∑ ⁡ 1≤k(−1)km−1 k−1 ln ⁡ k in Stirling’s generalization of the factorial function.

Proof. Stirling’s generalization of the factorial function is

ln ⁡ n! = ∑ 0≤mam+1 ∏ 0≤j≤m(n − j).

We must show that

am = (−1)m m! ∑ 1≤k(−1)km − 1 k − 1 ln ⁡ k.

But given

∑ 0≤jm j (−1)m−j = ∑ 0≤jm j (−1)m−j

we have

∑ 0≤jm j (−1)m−j ln ⁡ n! = ∑ 0≤jm j (−1)m−j ∑ 0≤kak+1 ∏ 0≤j≤k(n − j) = ∑ 0≤jm j (−1)m−j ∑ 0≤kak+1jk+1̲ from Eq. 1.2.5-18 = ∑ 0≤jm j (−1)m−j ∑ 0≤kak+1 j! (j − (k + 1))! from Eq. 1.2.5-21 = ∑ 0≤jm j (−1)m−j ∑ 0≤kak+1(k + 1)! j! (k + 1)!(j − (k + 1))! = ∑ 0≤jm j (−1)m−j ∑ 0≤kak+1(k + 1)! j k + 1 = ∑ 0≤jm j (−1)m−j ∑ 0≤kakk!j k − a00!j 0 = ∑ 0≤jm j (−1)m−j ∑ 0≤kakk!j k − a0 = ∑ 0≤jm j (−1)m−j ∑ 0≤kakk!j k −(−1)0 0! ∑ 1≤k(−1)k −1 k − 1ln ⁡ k = ∑ 0≤jm j (−1)m−j ∑ 0≤kakk!j k − 0 = ∑ 0≤jm j (−1)m−j ∑ 0≤kakk!j k = ∑ 0≤jm j (−1)m−j ∑ kk!akj k = ∑ kk!ak ∑ j j k m j (−1)m−j = m!am from Eq. (33)

And so

am = 1 m!∑ 0≤jm j (−1)m−j ln ⁡ n! = 1 m!∑ 0≤jm j (−1)m+j ln ⁡ n! = (−1)m m! ∑ 0≤jm j (−1)j ln ⁡ n! = (−1)m m! ∑ 0≤jm j (−1)j ∑ 1≤k≤n ln ⁡ k = (−1)m m! ∑ 0≤j ∑ 1≤k≤nm j (−1)j ln ⁡ k = (−1)m m! ∑ 1≤k ∑ k≤jm j (−1)j ln ⁡ k = (−1)m m! ∑ 1≤k ln ⁡ k∑ k≤jm j (−1)j = (−1)m m! ∑ 1≤k ln ⁡ k ∑ j≤mm j (−1)j −∑ j≤k−1m j (−1)j = (−1)m m! ∑ 1≤k ln ⁡ k (−1 + 1)m −∑ j≤k−1m j (−1)j from Eq. (13) = (−1)m m! ∑ 1≤k ln ⁡ k 0 −∑ j≤k−1m j (−1)j = (−1)m m! ∑ 1≤k ln ⁡ k(−1)∑ j≤k−1m j (−1)j = (−1)m m! ∑ 1≤k ln ⁡ k(−1)(−1)k−1m − 1 k − 1 from Eq. (18) = (−1)m m! ∑ 1≤k(−1)km − 1 k − 1 ln ⁡ k.

Therefore

am = (−1)m m! ∑ 1≤k(−1)km − 1 k − 1 ln ⁡ k

as we needed to show. □

58. [M23] (H. A. Rothe, 1811.) In the notation of Eq. (40), prove the “q-nomial theorem”:

(1 + x)(1 + qx)… ⁡(1 + qn−1x) = ∑ kn kqqk(k−1)∕2xk.

Also find q-nomial generalizations of the fundamental identities (17) and (21).

In order to prove the “q-nomial theorem”, we define

r kq = ∏ 1≤j≤k(1 − qr−j+1) ∏ 1≤j≤k(1 − qj) = ∏ 1≤j≤k1 − qr−j+1 1 − qj

and assume q-nomial symmetry

n kq = n n − kq

as well as the two q-Pascal identities

n + 1 k q = n kq + n k − 1qqn+1−k

and

n + 1 k q = n kqqk + n k − 1q.

Proposition. ∏ ⁡ 0≤k≤n−1(1 + qkx) = ∑ ⁡ 0≤k≤nn k qqk(k−1)∕2xk.

Proof. Let n and q be an arbitrary nonnegative integer and real number, respectively. We must show that

∏ 0≤k≤n−1(1 + qkx) = ∑ 0≤k≤nn kqqk(k−1)∕2xk

If n = 0

∏ 0≤k≤n−1(1 + qkx) = ∏ 0≤k≤−1(1 + qkx) = 1 = 1 1 = ∏ 1≤j≤0(1 − q0−j+1) ∏ 1≤j≤0(1 − qj) = 0 0q = 0 0qq(0)(−1)∕2x0 = ∑ 0≤k≤0 0 kqqk(k−1)∕2xk = ∑ 0≤k≤nn kqqk(k−1)∕2xk.

Then, assuming

∏ 0≤k≤n−1(1 + qkx) = ∑ 0≤k≤nn kqqk(k−1)∕2xk

we must show that

∏ 0≤k≤n(1 + qkx) = ∑ 0≤k≤n+1n + 1 k qqk(k−1)∕2xk.

But

∏ 0≤k≤n(1 + qkx) = (1 + qnx)∏ 0≤k≤n−1(1 + qkx) = (1 + qnx)∑ 0≤k≤nn kqqk(k−1)∕2xk = ∑ 0≤k≤nn kqqk(k−1)∕2xk + qnx∑ 0≤k≤nn kqqk(k−1)∕2xk = ∑ 0≤k≤nn kqqk(k−1)∕2xk + ∑ 0≤k≤nn kqqn+k(k−1)∕2xk+1 = ∑ 0≤k≤nn kqqk(k−1)∕2xk + ∑ 1≤k≤n+1 n k − 1qqn+(k−1)(k−2)∕2xk = ∑ 0≤k≤n+1n kqqk(k−1)∕2xk + ∑ 0≤k≤n+1 n k − 1qqn+(k−1)(k−2)∕2xk = ∑ 0≤k≤n+1 n kq + n k − 1qqn+(k−1)(k−2)∕2−k(k−1)∕2 qk(k−1)∕2xk = ∑ 0≤k≤n+1 n kq + n k − 1qqn+1−k qk(k−1)∕2xk = ∑ 0≤k≤n+1n + 1 k qqk(k−1)∕2xk.

Hence

∏ 0≤k≤n−1(1 + qkx) = ∑ 0≤k≤nn kqqk(k−1)∕2xk

as we needed to show. □

We may also find q-nomial generalizations of the fundamental identities (17) and (21).

For (17), we have

r kq = ∏ 1≤j≤k1 − qr−j+1 1 − qj = ∏ 1≤j≤k − 1 − 1 1 − qr−j+1 1 − qj = (−1)k ∏ 1≤j≤k −1 − qr−j+1 1 − qj = (−1)k ∏ 1≤j≤kqr−j+11 − q−r+j−1 1 − qj = (−1)k ∏ 1≤j≤kqr−j+1 1 − qj ∏ 1≤j≤k1 − q−r+j−1 = (−1)k ∏ 1≤j≤kqr−j+1 1 − qj ∏ 1≤−j+k+1≤k1 − q−r+j−1 = (−1)k ∏ 1≤j≤kqr−j+1 1 − qj ∏ 1≤−j+k+1≤k1 − qk−r−(−j+k+1) = (−1)k ∏ 1≤j≤kqr−j+1 1 − qj ∏ 1≤j≤k1 − qk−r−j = (−1)k ∏ 1≤j≤kqr−j+11 − qk−r−j 1 − qj = (−1)k ∏ 1≤j≤kqr ∏ 1≤j≤kqj−1 ∏ 1≤j≤k1 − qk−r−j 1 − qj = (−1)k qkr (q1−1 qk−1 )k ∏ 1≤j≤k1 − qk−r−j 1 − qj = (−1)k qkr qk(k−1)∕2 ∏ 1≤j≤k1 − qk−r−j 1 − qj = (−1)kqkr−k(k−1)∕2 ∏ 1≤j≤k1 − qk−r−j 1 − qj = (−1)kqkr−k(k−1)∕2 ∏ 1≤j≤k1 − qk−r−1−j+1 1 − qj = (−1)kqkr−k(k−1)∕2k − r − 1 k q = (−1)kk − r − 1 k qqkr−k(k−1)∕2

so that the q-nomial generalizations of the fundamental identity (17) is

r kq = (−1)kk − r − 1 k qqkr−k(k−1)∕2.

For (21), the q-nomial theorem

∏ 0≤k≤n−1(1 + qkx) = ∑ 0≤k≤nn kqqk(k−1)∕2xk

gives us

∑ 0≤n≤r+sr + s n qqn(n−1)∕2xn = ∏ 0≤n≤r+s−1(1 + qnx) = ∏ 0≤k≤r−1(1 + qkx)∏ r≤k≤r+s−1(1 + qkx) = ∏ 0≤k≤r−1(1 + qkx)∏ 0≤k−r≤s−1(1 + qkx) = ∏ 0≤k≤r−1(1 + qkx)∏ 0≤k≤s−1(1 + qk+rx) = ∏ 0≤k≤r−1(1 + qkx)∏ 0≤k≤s−1(1 + qkqrx) = ∑ 0≤k≤rr kqqk(k−1)∕2xk ∑ 0≤k≤ss kqqk(k−1)∕2(qrx)k = ∑ 0≤k≤rr kqqk(k−1)∕2xk ∑ 0≤k≤ss kqqk(k−1)∕2qrkxk = ∑ 0≤k≤rr kqqk(k−1)∕2xk ∑ 0≤n−k≤s s n − kqq(n−k)(n−k−1)∕2qr(n−k)xn−k = ∑ 0≤n≤r+s ∑ 0≤k≤rr kq s n − kqqk(k−1)∕2q(n−k)(n−k−1)∕2qr(n−k) xn = ∑ 0≤n≤r+s ∑ 0≤k≤rr kq s n − kqqk2∕2−k∕2+n2∕2−nk∕2−kn∕2+k2∕2−n∕2+k∕2+rn−rk xn = ∑ 0≤n≤r+s ∑ 0≤k≤rr kq s n − kqqk2+n2∕2−nk−n∕2+rn−rk xn.

Equating coefficients yields

r + s n qqn(n−1)∕2 = ∑ 0≤k≤rr kq s n − kqqk2+n2∕2−nk−n∕2+rn−rk
if and only if r + s n q = ∑ 0≤k≤rr kq s n − kqqk2+n2∕2−nk−n∕2+rn−rk qn(n−1)∕2 = ∑ 0≤k≤rr kq s n − kqqk2+n2∕2−nk−n∕2+rn−rk−n2∕2+n∕2 = ∑ 0≤k≤rr kq s n − kqqk2−nk+rn−rk = ∑ 0≤k≤rr kq s n − kqq(r−k)(n−k) = ∑ 0≤k≤ss kq r n − kqq(s−k)(n−k) = ∑ 0≤k≤rr kq s n − kqq(s−n+k)k

so that the q-nomial generalizations of the fundamental identity (21) is

r + s n q = ∑ 0≤k≤rr kq s n − kqq(r−k)(n−k) = ∑ 0≤k≤rr kq s n − kqq(s−n+k)k.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

H. A. Rothe, Systematisches Lehrbuch der Arithmetik (Leipzig: 1811), xxix; F. Schweins, Analysis (Heidelberg: 1820), §151; D. E. Knuth, J. Combinatorial Theory A10 (1971), 178–180; G. Gasper and M. Rahman, Basic Hypergeometric Series (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990); C. F. Gauss, Commentationes societatis regiæ scientiarum Gottingensis recentiores 1 (1808), 147–186; Cauchy, Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. 17 (Paris, 1843), 523–531; C. G. J. Jacobi, Crelle 32 (1846), 197–204; E. Heine, Crelle 34 (1847), 285–328.

59. [M25] A sequence of numbers Ank, n ≥ 0, k ≥ 0, satisfies the relations An0 = 1, A0k = δ0k, Ank = A(n−1)k + A(n−1)(k−1) + n k for nk > 0. Find Ank.

We have that

Ank = (n + 1)n k − n k + 1

and may prove this by induction.

Proposition. Ank = (n + 1)n k − n k+1.

Proof. Let n and k be arbitrary integers such that n ≥ 0, k ≥ 0, and nk > 0. We must show that

Ank = (n + 1)n k − n k + 1.

First note that

An0 = (n + 1)n 0 − n 0 + 1 = n + 1 − n = 1

and

A0k = (0 + 1)0 k − 0 k + 1 = δ0k

as required. If n = 1, we have

A1k = A0k + A0(k−1) + 1 k = δ0k + δ0(k−1) + 1 k = 0 k − 0 k + 1 + 0 k − 1 − 0 k + 1 k = 0 k + 0 k − 1 + 1 k − 0 k + 1 + 0 k = 1 k + 1 k − 1 k + 1 = 21 k − 1 k + 1 = (1 + 1)1 k − 1 k + 1.

Then, assuming

Ank = (n + 1)n k − n k + 1

we must show that

A(n+1)k = ((n + 1) + 1)n + 1 k − n + 1 k + 1.

But

A(n+1)k = Ank + An(k−1) + n + 1 k = (n + 1)n k − n k + 1 + (n + 1) n k − 1 − n k + n + 1 k = (n + 1) n k + n k − 1 + n + 1 k − n k + 1 + n k = (n + 1)n + 1 k + n + 1 k − n + 1 k + 1 = (n + 2)n + 1 k − n + 1 k + 1 = ((n + 1) + 1)n + 1 k − n + 1 k + 1

as we needed to show. □

60. [M23] We have seen that n k is the number of combinations of n things, k at a time, namely the number of ways to choose k different things out of a set of n. The combinations with repetitions are similar to ordinary combinations, except that we may choose each object any number of times. Thus, the list (1) would be extended to include also aaa, aab, aac, aad, aae, abb, etc., if we were considering combinations with repetition. How many k-combinations of n objects are there, if repetition is allowed?

The number of k-combinations of n objects, if repetition is allowed, is given by

n + k − 1 k .

The number of k-combinations of n objects, if repetition is not allowed is simply the number of integer solutions (o1,o2,… ⁡,ok) such that 0 < o1 < o2 < ⋯ < ok < n + 1, known to be

|{oi : 0 < o1 < o2 < ⋯ < ok < n + 1}| = n k.

If repetitions are allowed, we want to determine

|{oi : 0 < o1 ≤ o2 ≤⋯ ≤ ok < n + 1}| = |{oi : 0 < o1 < o2 + 1 < ⋯ < ok + k − 1 < n + k − 1 + 1}| = |{oi′ : 0 < o 1′ < o 2′ < ⋯ < o k′ < n + k}| = n + k − 1 k

and hence the result.

________________________________________________________________________________

H. F. Sherk, Crelle 3 (1828), 97; W. A. Förstemann, Crelle 13 (1835), 237.

61. [M25] Evaluate the sum

∑ kn + 1 k + 1 k m(−1)k−m,

thereby obtaining a companion formula for Eq. (55).

We have

∑ kn + 1 k + 1 k m(−1)k−m = ∑ k n n k + 1 + n k k m(−1)k−m from Eq. (46) = n∑ k n k + 1 k m(−1)k−m + ∑ kn k k m(−1)k−m = n∑ k n k + 1 k m(−1)k−m + (−1)n−m ∑ kn k k m(−1)n−k = n∑ k n k + 1 k m(−1)k−m + (−1)n−mδ mn from Eq. (47) = n∑ k n k + 1 k m(−1)k−m + δ mn.

If n < m then k < m and

n∑ k n k + 1 k m(−1)k−m + δ mn = 0 + 0 = 0.

If n = m then k < m and

n∑ k n k + 1 k m(−1)k−m + δ mn = 0 + 1 = 1.

Otherwise, if n > m

n∑ k n k + 1 k m(−1)k−m + δ mn = n∑ k n k + 1 k m(−1)k−m = n!∕m!

which we may prove by induction.

Proposition. n∑ ⁡ k n k+1 k m(−1)k−m = n!∕m! for 0 ≤ m < n.

Proof. Let m and n be arbitrary nonnegative integers such that m < n. We must show that

n∑ k n k + 1 k m(−1)k−m = n!∕m!

If n = 1, 0 ≤ m < n = 1⇒m = 0 and

n∑ k n k + 1 k m(−1)k−m = ∑ k 1 k + 1 k 0(−1)k = ∑ k 1 k + 1 k 0(−1)k = 1 1 0 0(−1)0 = 1 = 1!∕0! = n!∕m!

Then, assuming

n∑ k n k + 1 k m(−1)k−m = n!∕m!

we must show that

(n + 1)∑ kn + 1 k + 1 k m(−1)k−m = (n + 1)!∕m!

But

(n + 1)∑ kn + 1 k + 1 k m(−1)k−m = (n + 1)∑ k n n k + 1 + n k k m(−1)k−m = (n + 1)∑ kn n k + 1 k m(−1)k−m + (n + 1)∑ kn k k m(−1)k−m = (n + 1)n∑ k n k + 1 k m(−1)k−m + (n + 1)∑ kn k k m(−1)k−m = (n + 1)n!∕m! + (n + 1)∑ kn k k m(−1)k−m = (n + 1)n!∕m! + (n + 1)∑ kn k k m(−1)n−k(−1)k−m−n+k = (n + 1)n!∕m! + (n + 1)(−1)m+n ∑ kn k k m(−1)n−k = (n + 1)n!∕m! + (n + 1)(−1)m+nδ mn from Eq. (47) = (n + 1)n!∕m! + 0 = (n + 1)n!∕m! = (n + 1)!∕m!

as we needed to show. □

And so, since

∑ kn + 1 k + 1 k m(−1)k−m = 0 if n < m 1 if n = m n!∕m!otherwise

we have that

∑ kn + 1 k + 1 k m(−1)k−m = [n ≥ m]n!∕m!

62. [M23] The text gives formulas for sums involving a product of two binomial coefficients. Of the sums involving a product of three binomial coefficients, the following one and the identity of exercise 31 seem to be most useful:

∑ k(−1)kl + m l + k m + n m + k n + l n + k = (l + m + n)! l!m!n! ,integer l,m,n ≥ 0.

(The sum includes both positive and negative values of k.) Prove this identity. [Hint: There is a very short proof, which begins by applying the result of exercise 31.]

Proposition. ∑ ⁡ k(−1)kl+m l+k m+n m+k n+l n+k = (l+m+n)! l!m!n! , integer l,m,n ≥ 0.

Proof. Let l,m,n be arbitrary nonnegative integers. We must show that

∑ k(−1)kl + m l + k m + n m + k n + l n + k = (l + m + n)! l!m!n! .

But from exercise 31

∑ km − r + s k n + r − s n − k r + k m + n = r m s n

we have for m′ = m + k,n′ = l − k,r′ = m + n,s′ = n + l,k′ = j that

∑ k(−1)kl + m l + k m + n m + k n + l n + k = ∑ k(−1)kl + m l + k r′ m′ s′ s′− n′ = ∑ k(−1)kl + m l + k r′ m′ s′ n′ = ∑ k(−1)kl + m l + k ∑ k′m′− r′ + s′ k′ n′ + r′− s′ n′− k′ r′ + k′ m′ + n′ = ∑ k(−1)kl + m l + k ∑ jm + k − m − n + n + l j l − k + m + n − n − l l − k − j m + n + j m + k + l − k = ∑ k,j(−1)kl + m l + k l + k j m − k l − k − j m + n + j m + l = ∑ k,j(−1)k (l + m)! (m − k)!(l + k)! (l + k)! (l + k − j)!j! (m − k)! (m − l + j)!(l − k − j)! (m + n + j)! (n + j − l)!(m + l)! = ∑ k,j(−1)k 1 (l + k − j)!j! 1 (m − l + j)!(l − k − j)! (m + n + j)! (n + j − l)! = ∑ k,j(−1)k 1 (l − j − k)!(l − j + k)! (m + n + j)! j!(m − l + j)!(n + j − l)! = ∑ k,j(−1)k (2l − 2j)! (2l − 2j − (l − j + k))!(l − j + k)!(2l − 2j)! (m + n + j)! j!(m − l + j)!(n + j − l)! = ∑ k,j(−1)k 2l − 2j l − j + k (m + n + j)! (2l − 2j)!j!(m − l + j)!(n + j − l)! = ∑ k,j(−1)k 2l − 2j l − j + k 1 (2(l − j))! (m + n + j)! j!(m − l + j)!(n + j − l)! = ∑ k,j(−1)k 2l − 2j l − j + k(0 − 2(l − j))! 0! (2(l − j))!(0 − 2(l − j))! (m + n + j)! j!(m − l + j)!(n + j − l)! = ∑ k,j(−1)k 2l − 2j l − j + k(2(j − l))! 0 2(l − j) (m + n + j)! j!(m − l + j)!(n + j − l)! = ∑ k,j(−1)k 2l − 2j l − j + k(2(j − l))!δlj (m + n + j)! j!(m − l + j)!(n + j − l)! = ∑ k(−1)k 2l − 2l l − l + k(2(l − l))! (m + n + l)! l!(m − l + l)!(n + l − l)! = ∑ k(−1)k0 k0!(m + n + l)! l!m!n! = (−1)0(l + m + n)! l!m!n! = (l + m + n)! l!m!n!

as we needed to show. □

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

A. C. Dixon, Messenger of Math. 20 (1891), 79–80; A. C. Dixon, Proc. London Math. Soc. 35 (1903), 285–289; L. J. Rogers, Proc. London Math. Soc. 26 (1895), 15–32, §8; P. A. MacMahon, Quarterly Journal of Pure and Applied Math. 33 (1902), 274–288; John Dougall, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Society 25 (1907), 114–132.

63. [M30] If l, m, and n are integers and n ≥ 0, prove that

∑ j,k(−1)j+kj + k k + l r j n k s + n − j − k m − j = (−1)ln + r n + l s − r m − n − l.

Proposition. ∑ ⁡ j,k(−1)j+kj+k k+l r j n k s+n−j−k m−j = (−1)ln+r n+l s−r m−n−l, integers l, m, and n ≥ 0.

Proof. Let l, m, and n be arbitrary integers such that n ≥ 0. We must show that

∑ j,k(−1)j+kj + k k + l r j n k s + n − j − k m − j = (−1)ln + r n + l s − r m − n − l.

But as a polynomial in arbitary reals x and y, we have

∑ l,m ∑ j,k(−1)j+kj + k l + k r j n k s + n − j − k m − j xlym = ∑ m ∑ j,k(−1)j+k ∑ lj + k l + k xlr j n k s + n − j − k m − j ym = ∑ m ∑ j,k(−1)j+k ∑ l+kj + k l + k xlr j n k s + n − j − k m − j ym = ∑ m ∑ j,k(−1)j+k ∑ l+kj + k l + k xl+k xk r j n k s + n − j − k m − j ym = ∑ m ∑ j,k(−1)j+k(1 + x)j+k xk r j n k s + n − j − k m − j ym = ∑ j,k(−1)j+k(1 + x)j+k xk r j n k∑ ms + n − j − k m − j ym = ∑ j,k(−1)j+k(1 + x)j+k xk r j n k∑ m−js + n − j − k m − j ym = ∑ j,k(−1)j+k(1 + x)j+k xk r j n k∑ m−js + n − j − k m − j ym−jyj = ∑ j,k(−1)j+k(1 + x)j+k xk r j n k (1 + y)s+n−j−kyj = ∑ jr j (−1)j(1 + x)jyj (1 + y)j ∑ kn k (−1)k (1 + x)k (1 + y)kxk(1 + y)s+n = ∑ jr j −(1 + x)y 1 + y j ∑ kn k − 1 + x (1 + y)xk(1 + y)s+n = 1 −(1 + x)y 1 + y r 1 − 1 + x (1 + y)xn(1 + y)s+n = 1 + y − (1 + x)y 1 + y r (1 + y)x − (1 + x) (1 + y)x n(1 + y)s+n = 1 − xy 1 + y r (−1)(1 − xy) (1 + y)x n(1 + y)s+n = (1 − xy)r (1 + y)r (−1)n(1 − xy)n (1 + y)nxn (1 + y)s+n = (1 − xy)r (1 + y)r (−1)n(1 − xy)n xn (1 + y)s = (−1)n(1 − xy)n+r(1 + y)s−r xn .

Continuing,

(−1)n(1 − xy)n+r(1 + y)s−r xn = (−1)n ∑ n+ln+r n+l (−xy)n+l(1 + y)s−r xn = (−1)n ∑ ln+r n+l (−xy)n+l(1 + y)s−r xn = ∑ l(−1)2n+ln + r n + l (1 + y)s−rxlyn+l = ∑ l(−1)ln + r n + l (1 + y)s−rxlyn+l = ∑ l(−1)ln + r n + l ∑ m−n−l s − r m − n − lym−n−lxlyn+l = ∑ l(−1)ln + r n + l ∑ m s − r m − n − lym−n−lxlyn+l = ∑ l,m(−1)ln + r n + l s − r m − n − lxlym.

Equating coefficients yields the result

∑ j,k(−1)j+kj + k k + l r j n k s + n − j − k m − j = (−1)ln + r n + l s − r m − n − l

as we needed to show. □

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

CMath, exercises 5.83 and 5.106.

▸ 64. [M20] Show that n m is the number of ways to partition a set of n elements into m nonempty disjoint subsets. For example, the set {1,2,3,4} can be partitioned into two subsets in 4 2 = 7 ways: {1,2,3}{4}; {1,2,4}{3}; {1,3,4}{2}; {2,3,4}{1}; {1,2}{3,4}; {1,3}{2,4}; {1,4}{2,3}. Hint: Use Eq. (46).

Let p(n,m) denote the number of ways to partition a set of n elements into m nonempty disjoint subsets for nonnegative integers m, n. If n = 0, then clearly

p(0,m) = δ0m = 0 m.

Otherwise, if n > 0, we seek the number of partitions which contain the set n, given by p(n − 1,m − 1) and the number of partitions in which n has been inserted into sets with other elements, given by mp(n − 1,m). That is, from Eq. (46) and induction,

p(n,m) = p(n − 1,m − 1) + mp(n − 1,m) = n m,

and hence the claim.

65. [HM35] (B. F. Logan.) Prove Eqs. (59) and (60).

We may prove Eq. (59).

Proposition. zr = ∑ ⁡ k r r−kzr−k̲ for Re ⁡ (z) > 0.

Proof. Let r,z be arbitrary complex numbers such that Re ⁡ (z) > 0. We must show that

zr = ∑ k r r − kzr−k̲.

In the case that Re ⁡ (r) < 1, by definition and since Re ⁡ (z) > 0,

Γ(1 − r) = ∫ 0∞e−tt1−r−1dt = ∫ 0∞e−tt−rdt = zr−1 zr−1 ∫ 0∞e−tt−rdt = 1 zr−1 ∫ 0∞zr−1e−tt−rdt = 1 zr−1 ∫ 0∞zr−1e−zt(zt)−rdzt = 1 zr−1 ∫ 0∞zr−1−r+1e−ztt−rdt = 1 zr−1 ∫ 0∞e−ztt−rdt

if and only if

zr = z Γ(1 − r)∫ 0∞e−ztt−rdt = z Γ(1 − r)∫ 01(1 − u)z(−ln ⁡ (1 − u))−rd(−ln ⁡ (1 − u)) for e−t = 1 − u = z Γ(1 − r)∫ 01(1 − u)z−1 ln ⁡ 1 1 − u−rdu = z Γ(1 − r)∫ 01(1 − u)z−1u−r u−r ln ⁡ 1 1 − u−rdu = z Γ(1 − r)∫ 01(1 − u)z−1u−r 1 uln ⁡ 1 1 − u−rdu.

From Eq. (6.51)1

1 uln ⁡ 1 1 − u−r = −r∑ k−r + k −r uk (−r + k)k+1̲ = −r∑ k r r − k uk (−r + k)k+1̲ = −r∑ k r r − k Γ(−r)uk Γ(−r + k + 1) = ∑ k r r − k Γ(1 − r)uk Γ(−r + k + 1)

and given the definition of the β function as

∫ 0∞(1 − u)z−1uk−rdu = β(k − r + 1,z) = Γ(1 − r + k)Γ(z) Γ(1 − r + k + z)

we have that

zr = z Γ(1 − r)∫ 01(1 − u)z−1u−r 1 uln ⁡ 1 1 − u−rdu = z Γ(1 − r)∫ 01(1 − u)z−1u−r ∑ k r r − k Γ(1 − r)uk Γ(−r + k + 1)du = ∑ k r r − k z Γ(−r + k + 1)∫ 01(1 − u)z−1uk−rdu = ∑ k r r − k z Γ(−r + k + 1) Γ(1 − r + k)Γ(z) Γ(1 − r + k + z) = ∑ k r r − k zΓ(z) Γ(1 − r + k + z) = ∑ k r r − k Γ(z + 1) Γ(z − r + k + 1) = ∑ k r r − k z! (z − r + k)! = ∑ k r r − kzr−k̲

which establishes the case Re ⁡ (r) < 1. Then, assuming

zr = ∑ k r r − kzr−k̲

we must show that

zr+1 = ∑ k r + 1 r + 1 − kzr+1−k̲.

But from the recurrence relations for falling factorial powers

zzr−k̲ = zr−k+1̲ + (r − k)zr−k̲

and Eq. (46) we have that

zr+1 = zzr = z∑ k r r − kzr−k̲ = ∑ k r r − kzzr−k̲ = ∑ k r r − k(zr−k+1̲ + (r − k)zr−k̲) = ∑ k r r − kzr−k+1̲ + ∑ k−1 r r − (k − 1)(r − (k − 1))zr−(k−1)̲ = ∑ k r r − kzr−k+1̲ + ∑ k r r − k + 1(r − k + 1)zr−k+1̲ = ∑ k r r − k + (r − k + 1) r r − k + 1zr−k+1̲ = ∑ k r + 1 r + 1 − kzr+1−k̲

as we needed to show. □

We may also prove Eq. (60).

Proposition. zr̲ = ∑ ⁡ 0≤k≤m r r−k(−1)kzr−k + O(zr−m−1).

Proof. Let r,z be arbitrary complex numbers. We must show that

zr̲ = ∑ 0≤k≤m r r − k(−1)kzr−k + O(zr−m−1).

By Euler-Maclaurin summation for Stirling’s approximation2 we have that

∑ 1≤k<z ln ⁡ (k) = zln ⁡ (z) − z + σ −ln ⁡ (z) 2 + ∑ 1≤k≤m B2k 2k(2k − 1)z2k−1 + φm,z B2m+2 (2m + 2)(2m + 1)z2m+1, ∑ 1≤k<z−r ln ⁡ (k) = (z − r)ln ⁡ (z − r) − (z − r) + σ −ln ⁡ (z − r) 2 + ∑ 1≤k≤m B2k 2k(2k − 1)(z − r)2k−1 + φm,z−r B2m+2 (2m + 2)(2m + 1)(z − r)2m+1

for an arbitrary positive integer m, constant σ, “Stirling’s constant,” Bernoulli numbers Bk, and 0 < φm,x < 1, so that

ln ⁡ zr̲ zr = ln ⁡ z! zr(z − r)! = ln ⁡ (z!) − ln ⁡ ((z − r)!) − rln ⁡ (z) = −rln ⁡ (z) + ∑ 1≤k≤z ln ⁡ (k) −∑ 1≤k≤z−r ln ⁡ (k) = −rln ⁡ (z) + ln ⁡ (z) − ln ⁡ (z − r) + ∑ 1≤k<z ln ⁡ (k) −∑ 1≤k<z−r ln ⁡ (k) = (1 − r)ln ⁡ (z) − ln ⁡ (z − r) + ∑ 1≤k<z ln ⁡ (k) −∑ 1≤k<z−r ln ⁡ (k) = (1 − r)ln ⁡ (z) − ln ⁡ (z − r) + zln ⁡ (z) − z + σ −ln ⁡ (z) 2 + ∑ 1≤k≤m B2k 2k(2k − 1)z2k−1 + φm,z B2m+2 (2m + 2)(2m + 1)z2m+1 − (z − r)ln ⁡ (z − r) + (z − r) − σ + ln ⁡ (z − r) 2 −∑ 1≤k≤m B2k 2k(2k − 1)(z − r)2k−1 − φm,z−r B2m+2 (2m + 2)(2m + 1)(z − r)2m+1 = −r + (z − r + 1∕2)ln ⁡ (z) − (z − r + 1∕2)ln ⁡ (z − r) + ∑ 1≤k≤m B2k 2k(2k − 1) z−(2k−1) − (z − r)−(2k−1) + B2m+2 (2m + 2)(2m + 1) φm,zz−(2m+1) − φ m,z−r(z − r)−(2m+1) = −r − (z − r + 1∕2)ln ⁡ (1 − r∕z) + ∑ 1≤k≤m B2k 2k(2k − 1) z−(2k−1) − (z − r)−(2k−1) + B2m+2 (2m + 2)(2m + 1) φm,zz−(2m+1) − φ m,z−r(z − r)−(2m+1) .

That is, so that ln ⁡ zr̲ zr is a series in which each coefficient of z−k is a polynomial in r; and so similarly for the exponential

zr̲ zr = ∑ 0≤k≤mck(r)z−k + O(z−m−1)

with coefficients ck(r), polynomials in r, and with asymptotic bounds O(z−m−1), if and only if

zr̲ = ∑ 0≤k≤mck(r)zr−k + O(zr−m−1).

From Eq. (44) for r restricted to the integers

zr̲ = ∑ 0≤k≤rr k(−1)r−kzk = ∑ 0≤k≤r r r − k(−1)kzr−k,

and since r r−k is a polynomial in r of degree 2k whenever k is a nonnegative integer, the coefficients of zr−k hold for arbitrary complex r such that

ck(r) = r r − k(−1)k.

Therefore

∑ 0≤k≤mck(r)zr−k + O(zr−m−1) = ∑ 0≤k≤m r r − k(−1)kzr−k + O(zr−m−1).

and hence the result

zr̲ = ∑ 0≤k≤m r r − k(−1)kzr−k + O(zr−m−1).
□

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

AMM 99 (1992), 410–422.

66. [HM30] Suppose x, y, and z are real numbers satisfying

x n = y n + z n − 1,

where x ≥ n − 1, y ≥ n − 1, z > n − 2, and n is an integer ≥ 2. Prove that

x n − 1 ≤ y n − 1 + z n − 2 if and only if y ≥ z; x n + 1 ≤ y n + 1 + z n if and only if y ≤ z.

Proposition. x n−1 ≤ y n−1 + z n−2 iff y ≥ z, x n+1 ≤ y n+1 + z n iff y ≤ z.

Proof. Let x, y, and z be arbitrary real numbers and n an arbitrary integer ≥ 2 such that

x n = y n + z n − 1,

x ≥ n − 1, y ≥ n − 1, and z > n − 2. We must show that both

x n − 1 ≤ y n − 1 + z n − 2⇔y ≥ z

and

x n + 1 ≤ y n + 1 + z n⇔y ≤ z.

We will first show the former. Since y ≥ z,

x n = y n + z n − 1 ≥ z n + z n − 1 ≥ z + 1 n ,

and so x ≥ z + 1. Given the identities

a + n − 1 n − 1 = a + 0 − (−1)(n − 1) n − 1 = ∑ 0≤j≤n−1a − (−1)j j 0 − (−1)((n − 1) − j) (n − 1) − j a a − (−1)jfrom Eq. (26) = ∑ 0≤j≤n−1a + j j n − 1 − j n − 1 − j a a + j = ∑ 0≤j≤n−1a + j j a a + j = ∑ 0≤j≤n−1 (a + j)! j!(a + j − j)! a a + j = ∑ 0≤j≤n−1 a(a + j)! (a + j)j!a! = ∑ 0≤j≤n−1 (a + j − 1)! j!(a + j − 1 − j)! = ∑ 0≤j≤n−1a + j − 1 j

and

a + b n = a + (b − n) − (−1)n n = ∑ 0≤j≤na − (−1)j j (b − n) − (−1)(n − j) n − j a a − (−1)j from Eq. (26) = ∑ 0≤j≤na + j j b − j n − j a a + j = ∑ 0≤j≤na + j − j a + j a + j j b − j n − j = ∑ 0≤j≤na + j − 1 j b − j n − j from Eq. (8)

for arbitrary integers a,b; and letting x = t + x′, y = t + y′, z = t + n − 1,

x n = t + x′ n = ∑ 0≤j≤nt + j − 1 j x′− j n − j , y n = t + y′ n = ∑ 0≤j≤nt + j − 1 j y′− j n − j , z n − 1 = t + n − 1 n − 1 = ∑ 0≤j≤n−1t + j − 1 j ;

we have that

0 = y n + z n − 1 − x n = ∑ 0≤j≤nt + j − 1 j y′− j n − j + ∑ 0≤j≤n−1t + j − 1 j −∑ 0≤j≤nt + j − 1 j x′− j n − j = t + n − 1 n y′− n n − n − t + n − 1 n x′− n n − n + ∑ 0≤j≤n−1t + j − 1 j y′− j n − j + 1 − x′− j n − j = t + n − 1 n − t + n − 1 n + ∑ 0≤j≤n−1t + j − 1 j y′− j n − j + 1 − x′− j n − j = ∑ 0≤j≤n−1t + j − 1 j φn−j

where

φi = y′− n + i i + 1 − x′− n + i i .

Similarly, since t increases by one as n decreases by one,

y n − 1 + z n − 2 − x n − 1 = ∑ 0≤j≤n−2t + 1 + j − 1 j φn−1−j = ∑ 1≤j≤n−1t + j − 1 j − 1 φn−j = ∑ 1≤j≤n−1t + j − 1 j − 1 φn−j = ∑ 1≤j≤n−1 j t + j − 1 − j + 1 t + j − 1 j φn−j from Eqs. (7), (8) = ∑ 1≤j≤n−1j t t + j − 1 j φn−j = ∑ 0≤j≤n−1j t t + j − 1 j φn−j

with the understanding that in the case t = 0, we define 0 t = 0. Then, for all i, 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1, since x ≥ y⇔x′≥ y′ by hypothesis and x′ = x − t ≥ y − t ≥ z + 1 − t = n,

φi−1 = y′− n + i − 1 i − 1 + 1 − x′− n + i − 1 i − 1 = i y′− n + i y′− n + i i + 1 − i x′− n + i x′− n + i i ≥ i x′− n + i y′− n + i i + i x′− n + i − i x′− n + i x′− n + i i = i x′− n + i y′− n + i i + 1 − x′− n + i i = i x′− n + iφi ≥ 0.

but

φn = y′− n + n n + 1 − x′− n + n n = y′ n + 1 − x′ n = y′ n + n − 1 n − 1 − x′ n = y − t n + z − t n − 1 − x − t n ≤ 0.

And so finally,

y n − 1 + z n − 2 − x n − 1 = ∑ 0≤j≤n−1j t t + j − 1 j φn−j ≥∑ 0≤j≤n−11 t t + j − 1 j φn−j = 1 t∑ 0≤j≤n−1t + j − 1 j φn−j = 0

and hence the former result.

We will then show the latter, and it is sufficient to show that if

x n + 1 − y n + 1 − z n = 0

implies

d dz x n + 1 − y n + 1 − z n ≤ 0,

then

x n + 1 ≤ y n + 1 + z n⇔y ≤ z.

But assuming

x n + 1 − y n + 1 − z n = x − n n + 1 x n −y − n n + 1 y n −z − (n − 1) n z n − 1 = x − n n + 1 y n + z n − 1 −y − n n + 1 y n −z − n + 1 n z n − 1 = x − n n + 1 y n + x − n n + 1 z n − 1 −y − n n + 1 y n −z − n + 1 n z n − 1 = x − n n + 1 z n − 1 + x − y n + 1 y n −z − n + 1 n z n − 1 = 0

and since x ≥ y⇔x − y ≥ 0 by hypothesis, we have that

x − n n + 1 z n − 1 + x − y n + 1 y n −z − n + 1 n z n − 1 = 0 ⇔x − n n + 1 z n − 1 −z − n + 1 n z n − 1 ≤ 0 ⇔x − n n + 1 z n − 1 ≤ z − n + 1 n z n − 1 ⇔x − n n + 1 ≤ z − n + 1 n .

Also, with d dz z n−1 = d dz x n, and given that d dnn! = d dnΓ(n + 1) = n! −γ + ∑ ⁡ 1≤k≤n1 k for the Euler-Mascheroni constant γ,

d dx x nx n = 1 n! d dx x! (x − n)! x! n!(x − n)! = 1 n! (x − n)! d dxx! − x! d dx(x − n)! ((x − n)!)2 x! n!(x − n)! = (x − n)! d dxx! − x! d dx(x − n)! x!(x − n)! = (x − n)!x! −γ + ∑ 1≤k≤x1 k − x!(x − n)! −γ + ∑ 1≤k≤x−n1 k x!(x − n)! = −γ + ∑ 1≤k≤x1 k + γ −∑ 1≤k≤x−n1 k = ∑ x−n+1≤k≤x1 k = ∑ 0≤k≤n−1 1 x − k

and

n n + 1 d dz z n − 1 z n − 1 = n (n + 1)(n − 1)! d dz z! (z − (n − 1))! z! (n − 1)!(z − (n − 1))! = n (n + 1)(n − 1)! (z − (n − 1))! d dzz! − z! d dz(z − (n − 1))! ((z − (n − 1))!)2 z! (n − 1)!(z − (n − 1))! = n n + 1 (z − (n − 1))! d dzz! − z! d dz(z − (n − 1))! z!(z − (n − 1))! = n n + 1 (z − (n − 1))!z! −γ + ∑ 1≤k≤z1 k − z!(z − (n − 1))! −γ + ∑ 1≤k≤z−(n−1) 1 k z!(z − (n − 1))! = n n + 1 −γ + ∑ 1≤k≤z1 k + γ −∑ 1≤k≤z−(n−1) 1 k = n n + 1∑ z−(n−1)+1≤k≤z1 k = n n + 1∑ 0≤k≤n−2 1 z − k.

Also, since

⇔1 = 1 ⇔ d dx x n d dx x n = d dz z n − 1 d dz z n − 1 ⇔ d dx x n d dz z n − 1 d dx x n = d dz z n − 1 ⇔ d dx x n dx dz = d dz z n − 1

and since for arbitrary integers k ≥ 0, n ≤ n + 1⇒ k n+1 ≤ k n, we have that

x − n n + 1 ≤ z − n + 1 n ∧ k n + 1 ≤ k n ⇒x − n + k n + 1 + k n + 1 ≤ z − n + 1 n + k n. ⇔x − n + k n + 1 ≤ z − n + 1 + k n ⇔ 1 x − n + k ≥ n n + 1 1 z − n + 1 + k ⇒∑ 0≤k≤n−1 1 x − k ≥ n n + 1∑ 0≤k≤n−1 1 z − k ⇒∑ 0≤k≤n−1 1 x − k ≥ n n + 1∑ 0≤k≤n−2 1 z − k ⇒ d dx x nx n ≥ n n + 1 d dz z n − 1 z n − 1 ⇔ z n − 1 ≥ n n + 1 x n d dz z n − 1 d dx x n ⇔ z n − 1 ≥ n n + 1 x n dx dz ⇔1 n z n − 1 ≥ 1 n + 1 x n dx dz ⇔ 1 n + 1 x n dx dz ≤ 1 n z n − 1 ⇔ 1 n + 1 x n dx dz − 1 n z n − 1 ≤ 0.

Then

d dz x n + 1 − y n + 1 − z n = d dz x − n n + 1 x n −y − n n + 1 y n −z − (n − 1) n z n − 1 = d dz x − n n + 1 x n − d dz y − n n + 1 y n − d dz z − (n − 1) n z n − 1 = d dx dx dz x − n n + 1 x n − d dz z − (n − 1) n z n − 1 = x − n n + 1 d dx x n dx dz + 1 n + 1 x n dx dz −z − (n − 1) n d dz z n − 1 − 1 n z n − 1 = x − n n + 1 d dz z n − 1 + 1 n + 1 x n dx dz −z − (n − 1) n d dz z n − 1 − 1 n z n − 1 = 1 n + 1 x n dx dz − 1 n z n − 1 + x − n n + 1 −z − n + 1 n d dz z n − 1 ≤ x − n n + 1 −z − n + 1 n d dz z n − 1 ≤ 0

and hence the latter result. □

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

L. Lovász, Combinatorial Problems and Exercises (1993), Problem 13.31(a); R. M. Redheffer, AMM 103 (1996), 62–64.

▸ 67. [M20] We often need to know that binomial coefficients aren’t too large. Prove the easy-to-remember upper bound

n k ≤ ne k k,when n ≥ k ≥ 0.

Proposition. n k ≤ ne k k.

Proof. Let n and k be arbitrary integers such that n ≥ k ≥ 0. We must show that

n k ≤ ne k k.

In the case that k = 0, if we adopt the convention that ne k 0 = 1, then

n 0 = 1 ≤ ne k 0.

Otherwise, since clearly

nk̲ ≤ nk

and from exercise 1.2.5-24

kk ek−1 ≤ k!iff 1 k! ≤ ek−1 kk ,

we have that

n k = nk̲ k! ≤ nk k! ≤ ek−1 kk nk = 1 e nkek kk = 1 e ne k k ≤ ne k k.

Hence

n k ≤ ne k k

for all integers n ≥ k ≥ 0 as we needed to show. □

68. [M25] (A. de Moivre.) Prove that, if n is a nonnegative integer,

∑ kn kpk(1 − p)n−k|k − np| = 2⌈np⌉ n ⌈np⌉p⌈np⌉(1 − p)n+1−⌈np⌉.

Proposition. ∑ ⁡ kn k pk(1 − p)n−k|k − np| = 2⌈np⌉ n ⌈np⌉p⌈np⌉(1 − p)n+1−⌈np⌉.

Proof. Let n be a nonnegative integer. We must show that

∑ kn kpk(1 − p)n−k|k − np| = 2⌈np⌉ n ⌈np⌉p⌈np⌉(1 − p)n+1−⌈np⌉.

But

∑ kn kpk(1 − p)n−k|k − np| = ∑ k<⌈np⌉n kpk(1 − p)n−k|k − np| + ∑ ⌈np⌉≤kn kpk(1 − p)n−k|k − np| = ∑ k<⌈np⌉n kpk(1 − p)n−k(np − k) + ∑ ⌈np⌉≤kn kpk(1 − p)n−k(k − np) = ∑ k<⌈np⌉n kpk(1 − p)n−k (k + 1)n − k k + 1 p − k(1 − p) + ∑ ⌈np⌉≤kn kpk(1 − p)n−k k(1 − p) − (k + 1)n − k k + 1 p = ∑ k<⌈np⌉(k + 1) n k + 1pk+1(1 − p)n+1−(k+1) − kn kpk(1 − p)n+1−k + ∑ ⌈np⌉≤k kn kpk(1 − p)n+1−k − (k + 1) n k + 1pk+1(1 − p)n+1−(k+1) = ⌈np⌉ n ⌈np⌉p⌈np⌉(1 − p)n+1−⌈np⌉ + ⌈np⌉ n ⌈np⌉p⌈np⌉(1 − p)n+1−⌈np⌉ = 2⌈np⌉ n ⌈np⌉p⌈np⌉(1 − p)n+1−⌈np⌉

as we needed to show. □

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

De Moivre, Miscellanea Analytica (1730), 101; H. Poincaré, Calcul des Probabilités (1896), 56–60; P. Diaconis and S. Zabell, Statistical Science 6 (1991), 284–302.